#Reviewers

Rachel Walker PhD RN

UMassWalker

Meanwhile, nursing journal editors & reviewers scold authors who write about the harmful impacts of xenophobia & structural racism, rampant ableism and transmisia & the need to decenter whiteness for

Vignesh Raman

vigneshr11

A surprising number of peer reviewers request propensity score-matched analyses for studies about disparities in care. In part, I think this reflects the ignorance about and disinterest in work of

Dr Raul Pacheco-Vega

raulpacheco

There is something I have realized by participating in @amandabittner and @prof_mirya 's online writing retreats on a regular basis, something that should not surprise me at all, given that

Anne Scheel

annemscheel

So @jamesheathers' ruckus (ruckus-maker that he is) about $450 for peer reviewing seems to resonate with reviewers (cf @450Movement).I guess it's implicit in ppl's arguments around this, but what I'm

🥧 SUZANNE 🥧

425suzanne

External factors in selecting BG reviewersReachContent QualityGame taste fitAudience nichePast reviewsPersonalityInternal factors in selecting BG reviewersOverall reviewer pool mixProduction statusPre-prod copy costLanded production costShi

Insta

BatFren

remember when Postal 3 was outsourced to another studio and it got such negative reception from everyone that Running With Scissors ended up disowning the game the game was so

Micah Zenko

MicahZenko

Study of 6,794 Gates Foundation proposals finds female proposals are scored lower than male ones, even w/ blind review process. Key reason is men use more broad descriptive words, women

corey barnes

myanimewaifu

This article about the new DuckTales episode is exemplary of something troubling I see often in modern media criticism, and that's the strong desire to hold fiction accountable.https://io9.gizmodo.com/ducktales-has-blown-my-dang-mind-18

Prof. Priya Narasimhan

YinzcamPriya

TIP: Grad-school essay in 4 actsI review dozens of grad-school essays every year. If you’re writing one, talk about:1. What motivates you2. What has prepared you3. What you hope to

Stephanie E Suarez

geologiststephy

Why.... Can you imagine if I insinuated that my paper that said that "attractiveness is more detrimental than racism" got rejected based solely on the reviewers appearance????? I'm- then you're

Scott Berkun

berkun

You don't fully understand a design idea until you think through the scenarios where it will fail. All designs fail. In an infinite number of ways. What we call "good

Nick Brown

sTeamTraen

For what it's worth, I think that actually paying people to review would lead to all kind of foreseeable and unforeseeable problems, because adding money to a situation always does.

Gilad Feldman

giladfeldman

=grant reviewers as gatekeepers hindering replication work=Two years of Hong Kong's GRC grant requests for doing replications+extensions. Last year: Score 3.5/5Asked clarifications, I resubmitted with details.This year: Score 2/5. Fasci

Seanan McGuire

seananmcguire

Your feelings about a book are valid, whatever they are, and your opinion is your own, and I do not argue with reviewers, unless.Unless what I'm arguing with is "why

Michael Breakspear

DrBreaky

"How to cover letter"; a brief thread from a scientific editor's perspectiveYes, in brief editors do read cover letters although like myself, most pay far less attention than to the

Sarah Gailey

gaileyfrey

Looks like it's yet again time to remind reviewers that it is profoundly unnecessary to tag authors in your negative reviews of their work First of all, tagging an author