#Reviewers

Marco Taddei

taddeima

“On the transparency of the publishing process”: a thread based on a true story.I want to share a recent experience that a friend had with the editorial handling of a

death's favorite girl 💋

aballerinadoll

I'm glad the movie was cathartic for you but no need to act like it's going to be the same for other survivors/victims just because you've made this movie a

Laury Silvers 🕋 Author of The Sufi Mysteries

waraqamusa

Twitter friends! Could I ask you to retweet today's Hafsa thread? The threads have been a great way for me to reach out to new readers. As a self-published person,

Dr Isobornyl Nitters

mnitabach

It's difficult to get NIH grant applicants to believe that weaknesses like "interdependent aims" or "relevance to mammals/humans/in vivo unclear" or "scope too broad" or "insufficient experimental deta

Tony Shield

das_shield

I've been reading a lot of undergrad assignments, postgrad theses, research papers & a book recently. My overwhelming impression is that humans write poorly, so here are some unsolicited tips...

Sylvain ❄️👨🏻‍🎓

DevilleSy

Opening the review of my failed ERC grant after 3 months (that's what it took for the disappointment to fade). Let's see. 7 reviewers. Yep, that's how serious the ERC

🗑️

linoflirts

: Study tips ! — a thread as a dumb person who survived four years of getting actual good grades, I've used some methods that were pretty effective when it

Connor Gilroy

ccgilroy

This is on editors and reviewers. If we've collectively decided that use of particular data is unethical, then papers using those data *shouldn't be rewarded with publication.*https://twitter.com/wilbanks/status/1318970623591317504

ICCV2021

ICCV_2021

To encourage reviewers to consider the carefully crafted reviewer guidelines available at: http://iccv2021.thecvf.com/node/39 we will publish daily snippet reminders of these guidelines in this thread. #ReviewerGuidelines #ICCV2021. #D

Per Bylund

PerBylund

Peer review is an imperfect tool, and should not be treated as a Swiss army knife (always applicable). It has its uses where it works and adds value, but there

🥧 SUZANNE 🥧

425suzanne

Based on my email inbox... it's time to re-up this thread about requesting review copies for board games. YMMV.Reviewers are a valuable element of the hobby... but as casual an

Kristin Hook, PhD

Kristin_Hook

I’m a scientist who's spent the last decade of my life doing research. Everyone reading or watching the news lately has been exposed to more science & data than they

Bovine Blimp

comradebunni

i really dont like when cishet reviewers call a book a "gay book" just bc it has a gay relationship it in or talks about queerness bc like, yes there's

Colleen Caleshu

colleencaleshu

It is #NSGC20 abstract submission week, so time to re-up this spot-on thread from @kylewalterdavis on how to write a good abstract (and please reviewers). #GCchat https://twitter.com/kylewalterdavis/status/1017490929702318081 ps: it is

Christopher Barrie

cbarrie

Would encourage all editors to read this reflection from @danielskatz and @arfon on experiences with @JOSS_TheOJ follows with own experience submitting to @JOSS_TheOJ https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2021/05/06/guest-post-starting-a-nov

Richard Riley

Richard_D_Riley

Seeing a few comments suggesting peer review should be abandoned as it is takes too long or still misses things. It is not perfect BUT I can’t think of a