#Reviewers

(((James Acton)))

james_acton32

I strongly agree with this. And I have a theory that part of the reason why academic writing is often bad is because of peer review... (1/n)https://twitter.com/MorganLKaplan/status/1262769758761627648 I'm a think

Alan Baxter

AlanBaxter

Reviewers lamenting being too late to review a book: It's never too late! Reviews around release always help, but our careers are built in the long tail. We want our

Kirsty Sale

ElliottSale

A thread about reviewing.These are my opinions as an author, reviewer, editor & human being.It should go without saying...Being rejected from a journal is fine.Reviews contrary to your viewpoint are

Gijs Schumacher

GijsSchumacher

Preanalysis plans are great way to increase transparency in science, #openscience. But what do you put in a preanalysis plan (PAP)? Initially @bnbakker and I made a lot of mistakes.

Dr. Jessica Taylor

DrJessTaylor

A reminder that Elsevier made$6 BILLION selling your academic journals and articles behind paywalls, and made more profit than Amazon, Google and Apple every year for YEARS...And paid the academics

Alan Kelly

akellyucc

As a journal editor, I have just checked the stats for 10 papers I am handling. 68 review invites sent 13 accepted32 declined23 no response. Finding reviewers is getting harder

Atikin Games

AtikinGames

What's that you say? Please host a #boardgamerslift Nikita?Well I wouldn't want to let anyone down... and it is Sunday.... Oh alright then Share your #boardgame news and support your

David Dowdy

davidwdowdy

After sitting in study section last week reviewing proposals for K-series career development awards, thought I'd list my top 5 reasons why such proposals fail. (Not linked to any one

Daniel Bittman

danielbittman

A few years ago I was encouraged to keep a "co-CV" of rejected papers. Here's the entry for our recently published USENIX ATC paper on Twizzler, a new OS.Handling rejection

Michelle Cardel,PhD, MS, RD

MichelleCardel

Today, I finished my 4th @NIH study section (though first one via Zoom). I have learned so much through these experiences on what reviewers want, and more importantly, what they

Clare Bogen

clarebot

I've been thinking about this loads. There is a push/pull btwn reviewers and publishers. I'm sympathetic to both sides but what I really care about is that the earth is

Lisa Jaremka

LisaJaremka

Have you ever wondered what an NIH review panel meeting is like and how you can increase your likelihood of being funded? The review process has some positive features and

Zaric Zhakaron

zaric

A lot of people confuse the #GamesIndustry with the #GamesMedia. The AAA games industry sees games media as an unofficial arm of their marketing department. That's why they feel betrayed

Drustan de Búrca

svejky

I am annoyed because I had a rejection by two peer reviewers and it's not that any of the points either of them make are wrong but there's a joyless

Krista Wiegand

drkristawiegand

“we as a discipline (and especially editors) should actively consider which types of research we consider to be valuable and worthy of a spot in a generalist journal, and what

Per Engzell

pengzell

The review process demystified with Great British Bake Off gifs: the definitive THREAD. ** Manuscript submitted ** ”Submission #2021-00158 is currently being given full consideration” ”Your submission does not meet