Toggle navigation
TWText.com
TWText.com
faq
Contact US
Follow US
#Scotus
Dylan Scott
dylanlscott
for some reason, the parallel narratives liberals and conservatives advance about who’s politicizing and escalating SCOTUS nom fights drives home our polarization for me more than anything I think it’s
Read more
American Patriot 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
America16319046
"REPUBLICAN #SCOTUS PACKING: A LETTER TO THE PRESIDENT"Dear Mr. President .@realDonaldTrump,I am going to get straight to the point: I am sick of hearing the #LyingLeft claim you and the
Read more
Sam Spital
SamSpital
Respectfully disagree with @jamalgreene and @Jaime_ASantos on whether this was a close one. From my perspective, #SCOTUS's Wisconsin ruling was simply an exercise of judicial power that flouted basic rules
Read more
CBS News
CBSNews
Amy Coney Barrett, one of Trump’s frontrunners for replacing Ruth Bader Ginsburg, spoke with CBSN in February 2016 after Antonin Scalia’s death.She cautioned about replacing Scalia in an election year
Read more
Lily S. Axelrod
LilySAxelrod
THREAD: Lots of negative media speculation about #DACA after today's oral arguments at #SCOTUS but here are key things to keep in mind: 1/ There is NO #DACA decision today.
Read more
Anna O. Law
UnlawfulEntries
Legitimacy is critical to SCOTUS. The SCOTUS has no enforcement power. It's decisions are not self executing. See the massive backlash and rioting in southern states after the Court's Brown
Read more
Lindsay Ellis
thelindsayellis
This is just nauseating. Justice Ginsberg's literal dying wish was that they postpone the senate hearing until after inauguration, and yet a sitting Senator, who can vote against Barrett, is
Read more
flitedocnm
flitedocnm
Serious Q. Imagine this scenario:Trump loses the Nov election in a close vote. He:-declares the election to be fraudulent and invalid.-uses emergency powers to shut down Congress.-adds 2 RW justices
Read more
Elie Mystal
ElieNYC
I'm seeing a lot of "oh, but won't Republicans pack the court?"This is the wrong question. The Republicans ALREADY changed the number of Supreme Court justices when they refused to
Read more
Doc Kennedy
DocHeelfire
SCOTUS Vacancies in election years, a thread:tl;dr version: There is no precedent for not considering SCOTUS nominee when Pres/Sen are different parties. Only happened once before 2016, and that was
Read more
David Lat
DavidLat
THREAD. In the wake of her recent hospitalization, let's remember how strong Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, 87, truly is.#SCOTUS #appellatetwitter #NotoriousRBG #RuthBaderGinsburg #JusticeGinsburg Justice Ginsburg has defeated cancer at l
Read more
Loy Cannon
lesshumbleteej
In 2009, Roberts and the GOP overturned precedent in Citizens m United which allowed them have advantages in elections The republicans gutted the voting rights act after the 2012 election
Read more
Jonathan Ladd
jonmladd
Under pre-clearance, the Justice Dept approved every change in election procedures to make sure they weren't discriminatory. After Shelby County, with lots of new last minute shenanigans leading to emergency
Read more
John Cooper
thejcoop
“Well sir, don’t the voters deserve to know—“ “No, they don’t deserve” to know. So not only is the Left not answering whether they will pack the courts, their standard-bearer
Read more
The Nerdskull
aNerdskull
Biden supporters trying to ransom my vote by telling me about the Supreme Court.If you think Biden's SCOTUS picks will be any better than Trump's, you're an idiot. Look up
Read more
Leah Litman
LeahLitman
it's june medical BREYER HAS IT! (PLURALITY) CHIEF JUSTICE writes concurrence saying stare decisis compels this result (TRUE) https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf/18-1323_c07d.pdf #SCOTUS strikes down the LA admitting privileges
Read more
‹
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
...
75
76
›