This is just nauseating. Justice Ginsberg's literal dying wish was that they postpone the senate hearing until after inauguration, and yet a sitting Senator, who can vote against Barrett, is framing it as a "whoever sits on SCOTUS it's fine, vote!" as if we can vote on SCOTUS https://twitter.com/SenGillibrand/status/1316158149477519360
What, literally, are these bitches afraid of? Is a New York Senator afraid that the smoothbrains who buy into the "anti-Catholic" nonsense (ignoring that like a full half of SCOTUS is Catholic) would ever actually vote Democrat? What is the strategy here? show me your focus group
nah, I get that they are gonna lose the SCOTUS hearing unless one of these republican ghouls drops dead from covid, but that doesn't mean they can't fight it. that doesn't mean the electorate or history will harm them if they do fight it. why god why frame it like this?
WE KNOW WHAT IS HAPPENING. We know you have no structural way to block Barrett like McConnell blocked Garland. We know you can't win. And we (me) all hope Senators that share my name might be sick. That doesn't mean you have anything to gain by NOT. TRYING. AHHHHHHHHHH
ugh ppl in my @'s like "brrrbrbrbrr the corporate donors" - NO! the centrist, civil majority of the electorate is in favor of postponing the SCOTUS hearings, to say nothing of the Dem majority, which is WAY in favor of postponing, so WHY

WHYHWHWHYHHYHWYHW why
it is funny that no measure of alt right nonsense could get me to say anything, but @SenGillibrand posting such disingenuous propaganda was what broke me lol

And hey intern before you mute me, I have more than a quarter million followers, learn to court influencers you dummies
You can follow @thelindsayellis.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: