#Reviewers

Cat Sebastian

CatSWrites

I had a whole thread planned but instead what I’m going to say is this: pretty much the last thing this industry needs is fewer reviewers, or less passionate reviewers,

climate dynamics

climatedynamics

Question, how many reviews does it require to publish 1 paper? And how would you calculate that? Do re-reviews count? How about reject and resubmit? Depending on how you do

Esmée 🪐🏳️‍🌈

ServillasSpeaks

Okay we talking about how reviews aren't trustable when the reviewers are paid "bc pubs just want good reviews"Let's talk about pubs giving out ARCs long before authors are actually

Cole

colewehrle

One of the ickiest things about the board game industry is how many publishers think of reviewers. While there's plenty of respect (and money) directed towards content that could double

Claudia Rankins

STEMhasSoul

My thoughts today about the NSF GRFP. I first want to congratulate all 2,076recipients of the fellowship. You worked hard for this, you deserve it. Use thefellowship and do great

Laura Portwood-Stacer, Jeopardy Champ (she/her)

lportwoodstacer

FYI: peer review for scholarly books is not generally anonymized both ways. Part of what reviewers are asked to assess is the market for the proposed book. Your author platform—the

Losers & Losers

bad_dramaturg

crit is soooo important to a healthy arts scene and ppl in this city just spend all their time making sure everyone knows crit is not safe or productive to

Vincent Rajkumar

VincentRK

Frustrated about long delays in processing, rejections, and manuscripts being returned for formatting reasons? As an editor (and an author) here are some thoughts & tips. Happy to answer questions

Prof. Larisa

samclab

Thinking recently about how a lot of academia (like life in general, I guess) is a theory of mind exercise - trying to figure out what someone else is thinking.

Ana Baumann

BaumannAna

Hello authors and reviewers, can we talk? **thoughts from a recently appointed Associate Editor**a thread...: Authors: - please, pretty please check journal guidelines before submitting your work. It will make

Stacey Lowery Bretz

SLBCER

If you are an early career scholar facing uncertainty about publications and responding to reviewers, I want to encourage you to revise and resubmit. You don't eat a porterhouse steak

Dylan St. Jaymes

Dylan_StJaymes

No one, not a soul, is denying that publishing in general and Romancelandia in particular does *not* keep that same energy with AOC that they do w/white authors. It's not

Tibor Rohacs

RohacsTibor

Grant writing is a game. You need to understand the rules (written or unwritten). This is my somewhat arbitrary list of them: #1: Show excitement. If you are not excited,

Josebengoechea

josebengoechea

After attending a good number of funding panels in the last months few reflections: panel members are serving the community and it is an extra work load. But it is

Danushka Bollegala

Bollegala

A topic that we do not talk about much as a research community is what to do when papers get rejected. The reasons for rejections vary from obvious technical errors

Sam Gershman

gershbrain

I don't understand why CS conferences rely on a peer review system in which real revision is not possible. At @NeurIPSConf for example, author responses are limited to 1 page