#Preprints

1/11 This @biorxivpreprint is the result of a joyous collaboration with @Dey_Gautam @jessicapolka @nicholasmfraser @L_Brierley @mate_palfy that I've been positively bursting to share! https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.05.22.1

Counterpoint: If you think that the current world in which published science is peer reviewed has flaws (and it certainly does), wait until you see what a world without peer

Roger C. Schonfeld

Preprints have completely transformed the medical publishing landscape over the past four months. All the promised benefits and all the feared risks of preprints have come into stark relief against

A few takeaways on preprints and peer review from a great discussion group at the @turinginst, hosted by @f_nanni @makethecatwise. Thanks for the invitation, guys! 1/n (a) when we preprint

Rick McAlexander, PhD

New paper alert! @daarnon , me, and @MRubin11 examine depopulation outcomes in Palestinian villages during the 1948 War in Mandate Palestine. We argue that community social cohesion allowed some villages

Happy to share my first solo academic article, a mini-review now out on preprints:https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202008.0289/v1Like the boggarts popularized by Rowling, non-genetic changes are rapid and reversible. One way they can im

Je vous donne l'info. Les articles scientifiques ne sont pas peer reviewed, donc elles sont à prendre avec précaution. De plus, il n'y a, pour l'instant, pas d'essais cliniques.Il semble

The first paper of my Ph.D. is now up for discussion in @EGU_TC! Our @NASA_ICE and @Mass2Ant team use a state-of-the-art snow model, SNOWPACK @WSL_research , to simulate snow and

So remember how @nlm_news is putting preprints into PubMed now? ICYMI: https://nlmdirector.nlm.nih.gov/2020/06/09/the-nih-preprint-pilot-a-new-experiment-for-a-new-era/Well... are they following up and linking preprints to published article

Dr Olivia Rissland

On Jan 1, 2018, I decided to read more papers and started trying to read a paper a day. As of today, I have read 899 papers in 899 days.

Why I disagree: for me it's #PeerReview YES! & #Preprint YES! There are definitely not exclusive. A thread https://twitter.com/ScheuringLab/status/1304433607423991808 There are bad papers that pass peer-review. We have plenty of

Rima-Maria Rahal

Hi @Trevornoah,I’m a researcher and I just watched your commentary on preprint publications and scientific peer review (https://youtu.be/pn0MyDxUM6k ) and I’d love to help clarify some stuff. (1/n) First, allow me

I like this one by @JamesSteeleII @jpfisheruk and others. It shows findings from data analyzed from 14,690 people who participated in approximately 20 minutes of supervised strength training once a

21st century respiratory virus epidemics:SARS: Guangdong, China, 11/2002MERS: Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, 6/2012Covid-19: Wuhan, China, 12/2019Spot the common factor: very low relative air humidity.https://twitter.com/wrathofgnon/status/1230382802857680898

New pre-print with my good friend Sinan Yildirim:"A model of dynamic migration networks: Explaining Turkey's inter-provincial migration flows" https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/rf724/ via @OSFramework Here we analyse the netwo

Thomas Armstrong

PSA: Don't spend $30k on eye tracker for dwell time research! Get a @gazepoint, download OpenSesame, and use the built-in PyGaze toolbox by @esdalmaijer & @cogscinl for seamless eye tracking