2/11 #Preprints represent ~40% of the COVID19 literature (Jan-April) which is amazing - go preprints!
3/11 #COVID19 preprints are being accessed and downloaded more than non-COVID19 preprints
4/11 With all of this usage, how are preprints being shared? Well, COVID19 preprints are being heavily shared across Twitter but also by news organisations - is this a change in practice for journalists?
5/11 Hashtags associated with the 10 most tweeted #COVID19 preprints suggest conspiracy theorists are hijacking certain preprints đź‘Ž. But, also that for many preprints the science is making its way onto Twitter - our messages are getting across đź‘Ť
6/11 #COVID19 preprints have a much reduced time to publication compared to non-COVID19 preprints - Traditonal publishers are doing a good job of helping to speed up dissemination of COVID19 science
7/11 We dived deep into the preprints that have been published -> they're shorter and contain fewer total number of figure panels/tables - have scientists changed how they are reporting findings, prioritising getting data out rather than waiting to build up a bigger story?
8/11 We looked at ~100 preprint-paper pairs (COVID19 and non-COVID19). The majority of preprints that are published (~60%) had no real change in their figures. But more COVID19 preprints did have significant content added (peer-review is helping improve some of these manuscripts)
9/11 But wait! we're not done yet. We're currently working on a figure 6 - looking at how preprints are being used in government responses/policy - if you think you could help with that then please get in touch!
11/11 Finally a personal thanks to @Hughes_Hall for their support during my time in Cambridge!
You can follow @JACoates91.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: