#Filibuster

Ben Shapiro

benshapiro

Democrats' radically nuclear response to the SCOTUS vacancy is a real threat to Joe Biden's candidacy. Up until now, Biden has been able to run as the "take a breath"

Pradheep J. Shanker

Neoavatara

So, more I think about last night's debate, the angrier I got.First, Wallace asked good questions, but had zero control of the floor. My guess is Steve Scully and Kristen

Aaron Astor

AstorAaron

I agree with this. The most aggressive cancer on the American body politic is not and will not be the Supreme Court, which is largely reactive by nature. It's the

Adam Jentleson 🎈

AJentleson

This op-ed is a good roadmap laying out the relatively limited arguments that remain for defenders of the filibuster. It's worth taking a minute to break them down.https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/512512-unintended-consequences-o

Mark R. Levin

marklevinshow

1. The tyrannical Democrat Party and its media propagandists.The Senate Democrats want to eliminate the filibuster rule to ram through whatever laws they like; the House Democrats instituted proxy voting

David Atkins

DavidOAtkins

A lot of Democrats fail to understand why it's so important to expand the courts. It's about WAY more than even just Roe v Wade, the ACA, LGBTQ rights, or

Mark R. Levin

marklevinshow

1. The Senate Democrats didn't have the votes to stop an extremely well qualified ACB from being confirmed as a Supreme Court justice, or stop the president from carrying out

Jon Lieber

lieber2k

How the stars are aligning to permanently (?) rebalance power in DC towards Democrats: A SHORT THREAD (1/12)https://twitter.com/cnnbrk/status/1276589907658620931 1) The House-passed DC statehood bill, were it to become law, would

Ken Gardner

KenGardner11

Basically, the Democratic Party wants to remove every constitutional and institutional restraint — the Electoral College, equal state representation in the Senate, the filibuster, the 9 seat limit on the

Mark R. Levin

marklevinshow

1. NOTE TO CHUCK SCHUMER: IF YOU SHOULD WIN THE SENATE MAJORITY AND ADD SEATS TO THE SUPREME COURT, THEN WE SHALL ADD FURTHER SEATS WHEN WE RETURN TO THE

Contented Independent

ContentedIndie

The truth is: we failed at checks and balances.We failed. We have to make new ones. And if that means nuking the legislative filibuster and/or expanding the Supreme Court, then

Will Stancil

whstancil

Democrats across the board need to realize that with a 6-3 stolen court, the Biden administration is over on day one. Not only will it delete any response they have

David Roberts

drvolts

Why don't reporters ask Republicans about the way they've been packing courts for years? Has a single prominent Republican had to answer for or explain it? Did a single reporter

Nathan Brown

NateBrownNews

Today's general session at the Idaho Republican convention has started. Started with a prayer, pledge and the singing of the first (the one everyone knows) and less commonly known fourth

Spooky "Who is Hassanal Bolkiah?" Dude

nerdythor

This is like the filibuster from Billy Jack Goes to Washington except that Billy Jack wasn't trying to absorb all of the money from a podcast into his wallet for

Joshua Zeitz

JoshuaMZeitz

Democrats should take a cue from the generation of Northern Republicans that governed in the 1860s. Expand SCOTUS, kill the filibuster, admit new states, refuse to seat congressmen elected in