#Court

FairPlayForWomen

fairplaywomen

Transgender lawyer from @UCLA is misrepresenting court documents by suggesting that a judge has dismissed "biological sex" as a meaning way to allocate single-sex spaces. This is untrue /1https://twitter.com/chasestrangio/status/1

John McNamara

JohnMcNamara_

Really interesting set up in Scotland. A wall of monitors in the court room display the 15 jurors. Within the court room are the advocates, judge, defendant and witnesses. So

Josh Crabb

JoshRCrabb

Chief provincial public health officer Dr. Brent Roussin will be cross-examined in court this morning by lawyers for 7 MB churches and 3 people fighting COVID-19 restrictions, arguing they infringe

Mark R. Levin

marklevinshow

1. Some RINOs are arguing that the president should not act to fill the Supreme Court vacancy because it'll cause Biden to win, and then the Democrats will expand and

Stephen Pallaras

StephenPallaras

So why then do we need victim witnesses,investigating police, DPP, committing Magistrates, juries of 12 or the Court of Appeal? Just ask the High Court who apparently know better than

Gautam Bhatia

gautambhatia88

How the State and its lawyers played the Supreme Court and fired from the shoulders of the judiciary, a thread. (1/n)https://twitter.com/barandbench/status/1273520303939784705 See the MHA Order on the Yatra (h/t: @parasnsingh95)

auklegal

auklegal1

LEGAL LESSONS LEARNT FROM THE CASE OF UDE JONES UDEOGU V FRN & 2 ORS. #Thread The Supreme Court decided in our favour on the appeal arising from the case

Inibehe Effiong

InibeheEffiong

This is the English translation of the judgment of the Sharia Court in Kano that sentenced Sharif Yahaya Sharif to death over allged blasphemy.It has been established, based on the

Judge Jill Karofsky

judgekarofsky

(1/ 3) Did you see this? All of the WI Supreme Court, who moved to hold in-person voting last Tuesday, voted absentee.https://www.jsonline.com/story/news/investigations/daniel-bice/2020/04/13/wisconsin-election-supreme-court-justices-all-voted-absent

Justin Levitt

_justinlevitt_

Hey, look, another Supreme Court stay, changing the rules for an impending deadline (the Census, this time), overruling both a trial court and court of appeals, without any explanation why!"Because

avocadobread&roses

HilaryDarcy

This case reads as a failure in community policing, where longstanding relations of trust+respect would be in place rather than PR, photo Ops, over policing of poor communities+criminalisation of youth.

Aankhi

AankhiGM

The Delhi High Court has now denied making any request for a special 100 bed Covid facility in Ashoka hotel. Good of the court to give admonish the Delhi govt

Larry Schweikart

LarrySchweikart

Here is a leftist interpretation of the PA and NC rulings today: 1) In PA case, "if the race for Pennsylvania’s presidential electors—or perhaps a congressional election—is close enough that

Mark R. Levin

marklevinshow

1. The Democrat executive branch immediately appealed this ruling to the PA Supreme Court to quickly bypass this lower court’s ruling because the PA Supreme Court is a rogue court

Alec Karakatsanis

equalityAlec

A few years ago, I watched officers bring a 9-year-old child into court in full metal waist, hand, and foot restraints. Then another child. And another. I was told no

Peter

shadowfuzz

The entire legal profession, at every institutional level from the Supreme Court down to county traffic court, is constructed to ensure above all that those with power are immune from