Read on Twitter
Transgender lawyer from @UCLA is misrepresenting court documents by suggesting that a judge has dismissed "biological sex" as a meaning way to allocate single-sex spaces. This is untrue /1 https://twitter.com/chasestrangio/status/1298678363360579586
The court was instead referring to a concept referred to as 'biological gender' and not sex.
From the same document: "Biological gender... conflates two medical concepts; a person's biological sex and gender [identity]. /2
![The court was instead referring to a concept referred to as 'biological gender' and not sex. From the same document: "Biological gender... conflates two medical concepts; a person's biological sex and gender [identity]. /2](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EglMH5TXkAEMupu.jpg "The court was instead referring to a concept referred to as 'biological gender' and not sex. From the same document: \"Biological gender... conflates two medical concepts; a person's biological sex and gender [identity]. /2")
From the same document: "Biological gender... conflates two medical concepts; a person's biological sex and gender [identity]. /2
So the court actually says the opposite to @chasestrangio's interpretation. The court ruling dismisses gender identity as a meaningful way to allocate single-sex spaces. /3
Why is a lawyer at @UCLA misrepresenting court rulings about sex and gender identity in this way?
UCLA is an powerful organisation fighting *against* the court proceedings brought by US female students to keep women's sport opportunities for females only. /4
UCLA is an powerful organisation fighting *against* the court proceedings brought by US female students to keep women's sport opportunities for females only. /4
