#Constitutionalists

Dominic Bayer

DominicBayer4

I hate to say it, but this is based on a fundamental misunderstanding of what Common-good Constitutionalists are advocating. (/1)https://twitter.com/BayerPicciotti/status/1380569536446005249 Common-Good Constitutionalists do not advocate fo

Mark R. Levin

marklevinshow

1. NOTE TO CHUCK SCHUMER: IF YOU SHOULD WIN THE SENATE MAJORITY AND ADD SEATS TO THE SUPREME COURT, THEN WE SHALL ADD FURTHER SEATS WHEN WE RETURN TO THE

𝙼𝚊𝚛𝚝𝚢 𝙳𝚞𝚛𝚎𝚗

martyduren

I’m not concerned with Amy Coney Barrett’s religion or size of her family. As an adoptive parent, I’m thrilled to see other adoptive parents.However, she’s to be a Supreme Court

Hon. Temba P. Mliswa

TembaMliswa

This country needs a dogmatic leader because democracy and it's ideals such as freedom of speech we don't accept. The indiscipline is too much. Mugabe had a peaceful reign because

Matthew Cortland, Esq

mattbc

"The Congress shall have Power...To establish Post Offices and Post Roads" – Article I, Section 8, Clause 7, U.S. Constitutionhttps://twitter.com/washingtonpost/status/1249032058493681664 They’re “constitutionalists” who believe that the 2n

“that woman from michigan”

sarahbee_34

Bernie or Bust voters:When you’re ready for it, a thread for your consideration. It’s about SCOTUS.Read it through & digest before becoming defensive.There are 2 electable people running for president

Ian McKelvey

ian_mckelvey

I’m going to go ahead and admit it. I know very little about the “Proud Boys.” What I do know is leftists are claiming the group is rooted in “white

Davis Laque

Laque_davis

1] By each passing day, i wonder what goes through #Mwonzora's mind as he continues to lose his #political battles with #Chamisa.How does he think of himself as SG of

Christopher J. Lee

joonhai

Short thread re: Amy Coney Barrett. The US Constitution is a COLONIAL document: written by colonists, written under conditions of colonialism. Despite its surface claims, "originalism" strikes me as anti-historicist

Harmeet K. Dhillon

pnjaban

1/ "Conservatives" impotently dithering about whether to support a Ginsburg replacement vote: Hanging in the balance is whether court, viz. J. Roberts, continues to block application of equal protection, due

Mr Grrr

Kitchy715

A thread--We, as constitutionalists, need to speak louder than both the pro life and pro abortion people. THIS is the argument for which we've been waiting. To be clear, the

Patrick Williams

patrckwilliams

esoteric political thread: somebody replied in a heated exchange with a trumpster under an original comment of mine, re: mail-in voting, "Why don't you like democracy?" The trumpster: We live

Ilan Wurman

ilan_wurman

Almost everything Prof. Chemerinsky says here about originalism is wrong. A thread. 1/6https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/21/opinion/supreme-court-amy-coney-barrett.html?smid=tw-nytopinion&smtyp=cur John Marshall wasn't an originalist?

Tom Nichols

RadioFreeTom

Yes, I read the Bret Stephens piece. Ho hum. Yes, the intolerant left is a threat. Stipulated. However, I have excoriated people on the left for most of my career.

Sam Parker 🇺🇲

SamParkerSenate

***Short thread on how to deal w/John Roberts's SCOTUS tyranny***1. Many know Marbury v. Madison (1803) established the doctrine of Judicial Review. Almost no non-lawyers know that the 2nd case

unseen1

unseen1_unseen

I've been trying this past week to fight the gaslighting of the fake media in regards to the Supreme Court. The fake media doesn't want you to know that the