#Surgisphere

Catherine Offord

The latest in @TheScientistLLC’s investigation into the enormous influence #Surgisphere has had on policy and research around the world. This installment: Latin America’s #ivermectin crisis.https://bit.ly/37IbGjy One of the (many)

James Todaro, MD

The Lancet HCQ study claims to include 63,315 hospitalized COVID-19 patients from N. America by April 14.By Apr 14, total COVID-19 hospitalizations for USA, Canada & Mexico was only ~67,000.There's

I've been sitting on a major topic that I think the non-scientist public needs a primer on, with particular significance to COVID-19 research.That topic: Research Misconducthttps://ori.hhs.gov/definition-misconductAnd what to do about

Boback Ziaeian 🤦🏻‍♂️

Let me take us all on a magical walk through the @Surgisphere "revision" and explanation given to the @lancet. Not everything looks like what it seems. I would hope @richardhorton1

Deixa o Loen te Leitar?🥛🇧🇷

Cada vez mais indícios que o estudo observacional com 96 mil pacientes que saiu na Lancet e serviu de argumento para o "banimento" da Hidroxicloroquina, usou dados fraudulentos na pesquisa

Vinay Prasad MD MPH

Oh look. The RECOVERY preprint is outI am glad I was a staunch advocate we adopt this asap as it was not a typical 'medicine by PR' because the manuscript

arkancide_is_real

Arkancideisreal

@thelancet have published another paper to try to show that #hydroxychloroquine is "dangerous" (it's not).Here's why I think it's fakehttps://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanrhe/article/PIIS2665-9913(20)30276-9/fulltext#

Another controversial paper from Surgisphere gp which published in Lancet on HCQ assoc. mortality1. Highly implausible Massive Mortality benefit for Ivermectin HR 0.2(0.11-0.37) 2. Didn't know 407 Patients in US

Joshua Niforatos, MD, MTS

reverendofdoubt

I gave @Surgisphere the benefit of the doubt. I believe this data is very possible to have. Other companies have similarly large EHR datasets, such SVS, Explorys, etc. I have

arkancide_is_real

Arkancideisreal

Here's why I think this #hrdoxychloroquine "study" data is fakehttps://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)31180-6/fulltext#sec1A thread....@99freemind @realDonaldTrump @PressSec (1) the study says that

Dominique PERETTI

Did you like the NEJM NY study? Let’s have a look at the Lancet’s!TLTR: again, the surprising stuff is in the appendix. So, wow! 96032 hospitalised patients from 671 hospitals!

1/11 THE LANCET #HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE STUDY: CONFLICT OF INTERESTS? This observational cohort study was signed by 4 cardiologists , not a virologist, epidemiologist or statistician signed the study. But let´s see

The world is full of charlatans and snake oil salesmen peddling crap. However, a special place in hell is reserved for those who hold medical degrees and still mislead masses

Puisque tout le monde en parle, penchons-nous sur cette étude qui fait trembler l'hydroxychloroquinosphère.https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)31180-6/fulltext#seccestitle170 Donc c'est la plus gross

1/ L'article paru dans The Lancet est basé sur un traitement statistique aussi propre que possible des facteurs pouvant affecter la comparaison entre groupes.https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)31180-6/fu

#hydroxychloroquine: je sais que c'est probablement inutile, parce que personne, dans un camp ou un autre, ne semble disposé à changer d'avis. Mais je me dis qu'il reste des gens