#Reviewer

#AcademicTwitter Dear Reviewer(s),I hope this thread finds you well. As an #ECR I dread opening my email once I receive notification about the outcome of my manuscript. I have this
Read more
The "peer review" files of @MartineWonner's HCQ paper published with a predatory journal is finally published. Here is how serious the review process was, I promise you will laugh https://twitter.com/fxcoudert/status/128521795
Read more
Read more
So one of the comments I got on my NSF proposal was that my Broader Impacts section was too vague. That it "is missing a concrete plan of specific activities
Read more
Very happy to see another paper for my PhD with @BrechtLab published in its final form at @JNeurophysiol https://journals.physiology.org/doi/full/10.1152/jn.00518.2019?af=R The paper is a much better version than the preprint, it
Read more
No one, not a soul, is denying that publishing in general and Romancelandia in particular does *not* keep that same energy with AOC that they do w/white authors. It's not
Read more
Every single one of these @WormsTeam17 The Director's Cut screenshots is unique in that it comes from a build of the game nobody has played in almost 24 years. 1.
Read more
In case you are thinking about this - the answer is:No. You should not be doing field work right now.A thread (1/5) 1) If you are in a state with
Read more
#DiscoveryProjects peer assessments will land in nervous applicants' inboxes in 3 weeks (18Jun).You've 2 weeks to submit a rejoinder.BUT you've just *3 days* to call out #BadReviewers!#ARC3DayRule appears designed to
Read more
Aaaaargh. My half yearly scream of just *please* show me (grant reviewer) you (applicant) have done a power analysis. I honestly don't want much - just something to show you
Read more
I think the thing that's bothering me most about @CIHR_IRSC cancelling this grant competition (after all grants were submitted, nonetheless) is that they didn't even check in to see if
Read more
I really hope that when tabletop gaming returns to normal, we can continue to normalise the use of digital prototyping on TTS/Tabletopia etc. Developing and play testing Familiar Alchemy has
Read more
FYI: peer review for scholarly books is not generally anonymized both ways. Part of what reviewers are asked to assess is the market for the proposed book. Your author platformβ€”the
Read more
Same problem with COLING/EMNLP and their workshops this year. Notifications now both come out around September, so not enough time for workshops to review the main conference rejects. Ergo, dual
Read more
In a recent review of The Next President, someone objected to the page that discusses America's first presidents because it includes the fact that most of them enslaved people. I'd
Read more
Twitter might seem like a not-so-kind place especially if you are a young student who just had your paper rejected by #NeurIPS2020. You might be seeing all your peers/professors talking
Read more