#DiscoveryProjects peer assessments will land in nervous applicants& #39; inboxes in 3 weeks (18Jun).
You& #39;ve 2 weeks to submit a rejoinder.
BUT you& #39;ve just *3 days* to call out #BadReviewers!
#ARC3DayRule appears designed to fail, supporting process over applicants.
Thread
https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="👇" title="Down pointing backhand index" aria-label="Emoji: Down pointing backhand index">
You& #39;ve 2 weeks to submit a rejoinder.
BUT you& #39;ve just *3 days* to call out #BadReviewers!
#ARC3DayRule appears designed to fail, supporting process over applicants.
Thread
#DiscoveryProjects are a chance for researchers to gain more independence, demonstrate their ideas, & make a difference *their* way.
They are prestigious but extremely competitive. So competitive that just one slightly biased reviewer can scupper a project, even a career.
They are prestigious but extremely competitive. So competitive that just one slightly biased reviewer can scupper a project, even a career.
Imagine you& #39;re a female or minority researcher, with all the systemic biases stacked against you. #DiscoveryProjects is your chance to break through. You work for 2 months & nail your proposal.
Now imagine a reviewer calls you a "fraud", "cheat" or just "not worth any money".
Now imagine a reviewer calls you a "fraud", "cheat" or just "not worth any money".
How long before you could muster a response?
Before you contact colleagues, & your Research Office, to ask what to do? How long before they respond?
What if you& #39;ve got other duties, like child care? Maybe you work part time, or it& #39;s grading time?
Or there& #39;s #pandemic.
Before you contact colleagues, & your Research Office, to ask what to do? How long before they respond?
What if you& #39;ve got other duties, like child care? Maybe you work part time, or it& #39;s grading time?
Or there& #39;s #pandemic.
Well, you& #39;d better hope it all adds up to less than 3 days.
Introducing the #ARC3DayRule
https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="👇" title="Down pointing backhand index" aria-label="Emoji: Down pointing backhand index">
(from https://www.arc.gov.au/grants/grant-application/rejoinders)
I">https://www.arc.gov.au/grants/gr... know, I know, the ARC& #39;s bold font cuts through all those silly barriers, especially the hit to mental health.
Introducing the #ARC3DayRule
(from https://www.arc.gov.au/grants/grant-application/rejoinders)
I">https://www.arc.gov.au/grants/gr... know, I know, the ARC& #39;s bold font cuts through all those silly barriers, especially the hit to mental health.
It& #39;s easy to see why Assessment Reviews have to be lodged well before the 2-week rejoinder period ends. ARC needs to assess them, respond to RO, RO needs to contact the applicant and, if the ARC said there& #39;s no problem, the rejoinder needs to address the reviewer& #39;s assessment.
But *3 days*? That& #39;s ridiculous!
Seems especially designed to *prevent* anyone raising concerns in time.
It& #39;ll hit early-career researchers – more likely female or minority – hardest: they& #39;re less likely to know the process & get help to do something about #BadReviewers.
Seems especially designed to *prevent* anyone raising concerns in time.
It& #39;ll hit early-career researchers – more likely female or minority – hardest: they& #39;re less likely to know the process & get help to do something about #BadReviewers.
As one DMer put it, ARC seems focussed on "bureaucracy rather than concern over poor peer review practices".
While we& #39;re on bureaucracy:
The ARC doesn& #39;t even report the number of Assessment Reviews requests it receives. Maybe one for #SenateEstimates, @Louise_Pratt, @SenKimCarr?
While we& #39;re on bureaucracy:
The ARC doesn& #39;t even report the number of Assessment Reviews requests it receives. Maybe one for #SenateEstimates, @Louise_Pratt, @SenKimCarr?
First, simple changes, @arc_gov_au:
https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="âś…" title="White heavy check mark" aria-label="Emoji: White heavy check mark"> #ARC3DayRule clear in notification that assessments in RMS
https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="âś…" title="White heavy check mark" aria-label="Emoji: White heavy check mark"> #ARC3DayRule clear in Grant Calendar
https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="âś…" title="White heavy check mark" aria-label="Emoji: White heavy check mark"> Report number of #BadReviewers per uni & year
https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="âś…" title="White heavy check mark" aria-label="Emoji: White heavy check mark"> Investigate & remove #BadReviewers even if request is lodged late
Fix, don& #39;t hide.
Fix, don& #39;t hide.
But really, 3 days is just never going to be enough, @arc_gov_au!
#ARC3DayRule needs to change. It needs to *triple* to at least 9 working days.
Maybe that means the rejoinder period needs to be 3 weeks, not 2. So be it, I reckon.
#ARC3DayRule needs to change. It needs to *triple* to at least 9 working days.
Maybe that means the rejoinder period needs to be 3 weeks, not 2. So be it, I reckon.
And Research Offices, some things you can do (if not already):
https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="âś…" title="White heavy check mark" aria-label="Emoji: White heavy check mark"> Scan assessments for defamatory, conflicted, discrim/biased comments
https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="âś…" title="White heavy check mark" aria-label="Emoji: White heavy check mark"> Alert applicants to #ARC3DayRule
https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="âś…" title="White heavy check mark" aria-label="Emoji: White heavy check mark"> Support applicants to report #BadReviewers
https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="âś…" title="White heavy check mark" aria-label="Emoji: White heavy check mark"> Assist affected applicants to counselling services