REXXURECTION, Discover and Read the Best of Twitter Threads by @rexxurection

1. More Chinese propaganda about their supposed naval strength.Why people fall for it I will never know.China has just 1 aircraft carrier - a converted Russian piece of trash -

This is concerning.On June 4, 2019 at DOJ's request (Van Grack), Judge Sullivan retracted his earlier demand that Van Grack / DOJ produce the actual Kislyak - Flynn transcript.What the

1. Xi is going to pay a terrible price for what he has done with the Wuhan virus. Consider:The CCP is owed $1 TRILLION + by the USA. The US

1. Holy crap.Did Obama and his thugs frame and remove CIA Director General Davis Petraeus, to replace him with John Brennan?Check this extract from an article from 10 November 2012:https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa

1. I'm amazed at how cool our corner of twitter is.So many extremely bright independent thinkers, trying to work stuff out.Yesterday, I reacted to Barr. Some agreed, others didn't.On the

1. I'm getting a bit concerned about this line I keep reading that 'it's not illegal to unmask' the ID of masked US citizens.Er - it most certainly IS illegal.Strict

1. Judge Sullivan continues to torch his reputation and legacy in real time.We are talking about the innocence of a citizen and Sullivan wants to turn the case into a

INCORRECT.The treason is created by conspirators (domestic or foreign) attacking the 'United States'. The 'United States' includes attacks on the Constitution, (eg office of the Presidency and the Congress).The acts

1. Checks out.Obama and his thugs had been illegally surveilling @GenFlynn since 2014 using a Title 3 warrant* (see next tweet)They use this to illegally unmask Gen Flynn & Team

I'm honored, Mr President @realDonaldTrump. Thank you.

Not Solomon's finest hour. A strange lapse of standards, I suspect caused by his new business not going so well. Disappointing https://twitter.com/AKA_RealDirty/status/1253132664707715074 Solomon came out a few days ago representing

@JohnWHuber asks : why redact something that's already known (Sergei Millian a sub-source for Steele)?Good question. Makes no sense.However, the redaction of the article may be for another reason :