@JohnWHuber asks : why redact something that's already known (Sergei Millian a sub-source for Steele)?

Good question. Makes no sense.

However, the redaction of the article may be for another reason : the #FakeNews authors are under investigation.

Now THAT would make sense. https://twitter.com/JohnWHuber/status/1251668783967674372

NOTE:

Key #WaPo reporters 'on Russian interference in the 2016 campaign and the ongoing investigation : Greg Miller, Ellen Nakashima, Adam Entous, Tom Hamburger, Rosalind S. Helderman, Sari Horwitz, Devlin Barrett, Greg Jaffe, Carol D. Leonnig, Ashley Parker, and Philip Rucker.'

3. Source : fawning, self-congratulatory puff piece by #WaPo itself on their 2018 Pulitzer Prize awards (for spreading Obama/Clinton lies, on behalf of the crooks in Att Durham's crosshairs).

That's why I think that article was redacted. https://www.washingtonpost.com/pr/wp/2018/04/16/the-washington-post-wins-2018-pulitzer-prize-for-investigative-reporting-and-for-national-reporting/

4. Note also that Trump has been far more direct in his #FakeNews attacks of late, specifically mentioning particular 'journalists'.

You think he's doing it by accident?

Trump doesn't do things by accident. EVER.

Today, it was Maggie Haberman, Clinton propagandist. Quote:

5. 'This is Maggie Haberman. You know, she won a Pulitzer Prize for her coverage of Russia but she was wrong on Russia. So was everyone else. They should all give back their Pulitzer Prizes. In fact it turned out that the crime was committed by the other side.'

AND:

6. 'The crime was not committed by this side, it was committed by the other side. A bunch of bad people.'

#FakeNews hacks are about to be EXPOSED, folks.

FISA redactions, Trump's attacks & AG Barr on offense, can't be just coincidental events.

Bring it on!

#MAGA

The end.