2 key points: 1/2:
“Why not just treat drivers as employees? Uber would only have full-time jobs for a small fraction of drivers and only be able to operate in many fewer cities... Rides would be more expensive, which would reduce rides and, in turn, # of drivers needed.” (MT)
2/2: To create a “third way” for gig work, “We need laws. Our current system is binary, meaning each time a company provides additional benefits to independent workers, the less independent they become. That creates [legal] risk” — @Uber needs legal paths for gig benefits (MT)
FOW folks @albertoarenaza @educationpalmer @batraatin @tstock915 what do you think? Just a lot of noise or is there something here?
Interesting — so it’s not buried in responses, just learned there’s a start on what this model might look like in more detail in @Uber’s white paper

https://www.uber.com/newsroom/working-together-priorities/
Next q: What does a great legal mind think? @emmarosepb is this feasible?
You can follow @cassidylev.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: