How can we assess the total number of #SARSCoV2 infections that have occurred up to this point? As others have noted, it& #39;s not easy to extrapolate from confirmed cases to total infections. Some thoughts here, but no real answers. 1/9
The gold-standard approach here is to conduct serological surveys of the population. These serological assays measure the presence of antibodies in people& #39;s blood that can bind to the virus. These responses persist for months rather than ~2-3 weeks for viral shedding. 2/9
Seroprevalence estimates will help to understand the total number of infections and should be more comparable across regions, as a cross-sectional serological survey should be closer to a random sample as opposed to testing which has varied in capacity. 5/9
However, at this point, I& #39;m not aware of any seroprevalence results and so we& #39;re left modeling total number of infections based on confirmed cases and deaths (perhaps supplemented by viral genetics). 6/9
This report by @MRC_Outbreak ( https://www.imperial.ac.uk/mrc-global-infectious-disease-analysis/covid-19/report-13-europe-npi-impact/),">https://www.imperial.ac.uk/mrc-globa... estimates total number of infections in different European countries based on observed cases and deaths, generally estimating between 1% and 15% of the population infected. 7/9
These numbers fall well short of "herd-immunity", which would require between 50% (for R0 of 2) and 66% (for R0 of 3) of the population recovered to prevent epidemic spread. 8/9
The arrival of seroprevalence estimates should help to dial in a lot of our numbers. By learning total number of infections we can better estimate population-level severity. Hopefully data from these studies will start to emerge soon. 9/9
You can follow @trvrb.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: