Noah Haber, Discover and Read the Best of Twitter Threads by @NoahHaber

Noah Haber

NoahHaber

RCTs having limitations and/or weak or misleading design does not automatically make observational studies better.Observational studies having limitations and/or weak or misleading design does not automatically make RCTs better.Limitations

Measure twice cut once (MTCO) is the solution if you want all 4 legs to be as close to 26" as you can. But that's not actually what you want.What

"Measure twice, cut once" is bullshit.A brief thread rant on woodworking and causal inference (yeah, you read that right).From table legs to descriptive stats tables, from picture frames to the

If you are considering tagging the "famous" ID epi folks to answer a question, consider tagging little old me instead as a pre-query.At the very least, I'll be able to

STATS QUIZ!I have the datapoints below. Nothing hidden, no tricks, just a bunch of data making roughly an ellipse.In your head, draw what you think the ordinary least squares line

A plea: please be extremely humble when considering any kind of policy impact evaluation.Impact evaluation requires a lot of things to come together just right, the right designs to capture

Alright fellow epi and econ friends, gather 'round, time for me to talk about this articleBecause I am a native econ whose life quest it is to bridge the epi/econ

New rule for headlines: You can only use an adjective intended to signal expertise if that person's opinion is consensus among all other people with that adjective.No more "Harvard/Stanford/Nobel

(non-COVID warning)"DAG With Omitted Objects Displayed (DAGWOOD): A framework for revealing causal assumptions in DAGs" is now up as a pre-print on arXiv!https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.04251 Please critique the hell out of it.@anecdatally

I am a literal actual professional in health evidence, statistics, study design, and misinformation, and I think I just got outclassed by a frozen meat product brand.I am here for