#Journals

Crystal Zheng

CrystalZhengMD

Seeing #medtwitter #academictwitter talk on errors after publication. Following in this researcher's example, I'd like to recall an error that changed my results from (+) to (-). Never published, but

Cory Doctorow

doctorow

My latest @locusmag column is "Full Employment," in which I forswear "Fully Automated Luxury Communism" as totally incompatible with the climate emergency, which will consume 100%+ of all human labor

ShrimpKocktail

ShrimpLingSoup

ALL OF THIS. I have 0 tolerance for folks who force their sexual fantasies on black women. Leave us alone https://www.ferris.edu/jimcrow/jezebel/ They did a study that proved white men LITERALLY

Dr. Arinjay Banerjee

sci_questions

1/n: A thread for researchers venturing into the field of #bat #virology.I have reviewed and learnt from your recent papers and I wanted to share some general thoughts:1. Bats are

ghaura

ghauraghaura

So there's a rumor going around that countries where people get the TB vaccine aren't getting hit hard by Covid 19. I wanted to investigate so here is what I

Paul Novosad

paulnovosad

How low is the bar for publishing a study showing stay-at-home orders work? Lower than you think.JAMA edition: fit an absurd exponential model to virus growth, credit the stay-at-home order

Dr Kirk Olsen

KirkOlsenPhD

Proud to announce our latest study from the ‘violent music’ project @Macquarie_Uni with @thomps95 and @MerrickPowell, reporting on the passions and experiences of music fans with specific focus on violent

Micah Zenko

MicahZenko

Study of 6,794 Gates Foundation proposals finds female proposals are scored lower than male ones, even w/ blind review process. Key reason is men use more broad descriptive words, women

Joan Shields

HomegrownJoan

There is a small but very vocal part of MedTwitter that posts lies, assumptions, innuendo and allegations. If it is not tolerated in your workplace then it should not be

Adam Kucharski

AdamJKucharski

How much could potential biases in early data affect our current understanding of COVID-19? This question crops up a lot, so let's look at three crucial aspects of that early

Sameer Jauhar

sameerjauhar

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0269881120922950#articleShareContainer Thread. Ppl critique efficacy of antidepressants, which is fair. Here @f_hieronymus and I examine this. Most MAs of acute tx hve effect size=0.3 for ADs in depr

Abraar Karan

AbraarKaran

*New @JAMA_current* adding to hospitalized #covid19 outcomes literature1/-Among 5700 patients in NYC2634 met study endpoint of "discharged" or "died"Of those:-14.2% were treated in the ICU-21% died-For the 12% that were

Eric Topol

EricTopol

Just out @TheLancet: The children with Kawasaki disease from #SARSCoV2A unique report from Italy comparing this to pre-#COVID19:the incidence has gone up 30-fold and it is more severe, with more

Jay Van Bavel

jayvanbavel

[1] I changed my graduate teaching last year to encourage my students to think more about replication and it's already had a positive impact on our research.I figured I would

Marion Campbell

MarionKCampbell

Some reflections on the crucial role of trial data monitoring committees (#DMCs) at this time when we try to find out, via clinical trials, which treatments are effective for the

Amy C🍩🍩pes

coopesdetat

Applying for my first ever medical job. No idea how to approach a CV. What should I include? Especially don't know how much of my intercurrent is relevant/of interest. What