Read on Twitter
The irony of this case is that in Spencer’s utopian state, you will not have the freedoms he has. You will not have the power to plea with the law to have your word spread nor will the press or individuals be able to exist or express themselves freely. https://twitter.com/richardbspencer/status/989876461128617984
If you doubt my assertion, listen again to his famous conversation with warski. He and millennial woes talk about how the press in the ethno state will not be able to do as they wish. They will be shut down. Same goes to individuals.
Furthermore, the ethno state literally makes it important to be a first class citizen, if at all, if you’re not white. The ethno state will not allow mixing of populations. They will remove any and all dissenting voices.
Spencer reminds me of Anjem Chaudary. He uses the freedoms given in his country to preach for sharia for UK. He’s possibly more effective in conveying the idea of an ethno state as non violent but it’s nothing but a smokescreen.
In tweet 3- it’s impossible, not important. Darn autocorrect.
Pay close attention to his references to free speech and how people like him will use the system to promote a society that’s the opposite of freedom and self determination. I will not, in good conscience, support people like him on behalf of free speech.
The new free speech battle is now over BDS. People like Omar Barghouti, Ilhan Omar, Rashida Talib, & Sarsour are claiming this is free speech. Anti BDS Laws do not prevent individuals from participating in boycotts in their personal capacities as well as their personal speech.
What the law requires is that “a government contractor, in its capacity as a contractor, certify that it is not currently engaged in a boycott that impairs the State’s commerce with Israel.” https://www.ajc.org/news/ajc-urges-appellate-court-to-remove-block-on-arizona-anti-bds-law
Since 1977, federal law has permitted civil penalties against US corporations that participate in boycott requests from foreign countries against US allies, or that make such requests themselves. None restricts free speech or penalizes individuals. https://www.algemeiner.com/2017/10/30/why-bds-laws-dont-violate-free-speech/
In this thread, I provide examples from different countries, of limits of free speech in favor of eliminating a clear threat to minorities and civil society. https://twitter.com/Claire_Voltaire/status/975091718918778880
Shocked Rashida Tlaib would use this argument. Misleading and dishonest.
Oh, look who joined- the rest of the JD clown car.
