The Dangers of Arab Localism and Al-Shu’biyyah:

[Thread]

What is Modern Shu’biyyah?
The definition of Shu’biyyah in more non-linguistic but rather more casual terms is the anti-Arabian belief. There has been two forms of this Arab populist belief, the modern and the historic.

The two share the same meanings and goals generally, the difference however is the means to achieving said goals. So, the historic form of Arab populism was to weaken Arabs by ousting
them from administrative positions in the late Umayyad period.

In the modern sense, it's to weaken the Arab people through the means of turning them against one another and motivating them to deny the ancestry of one another gradually in order to lessen the number of existing Arabs and have them devolve into petty marginalized identities.

The modern Arab localist developed a separating and dangerous term to achieve his Arabic localist goals in amore sufficient way. And that term is "أمصاري” and he strives to (by the usage) of this term to “un-Arabize” a huge portion Arabs.

Despite the term linguistically and historically meaning larger cities. He also uses the term "موالي" incorrecity as it has historically referred to Arabs and non-Arabs collectively. He generalized it as to referring to all non-Peninsular Arabs without the usage of logic or proof

The modern Arab localist also denies basic history to further his goals. They deny the existence of the Amaliqites, they deny the existence of the Palmyrene empire, etc. their ignorance regarding regional history emphasizes their historical illiteracy.

What are the goals of Arab Localist? How will they achieve them? How do you identify them?

The goal of the modern Arab localist is to weaken and devolve
the Arabian nation and the Arabian identity.

They want to devolve the Arabian identity from a global identity covering a vast territory into a limited and vulnerable identity. And to
bring down it’s language from the fifth most spoken language
in the world into a localized limited, marginalized language.

And by that we can summarize their goals in: They want the Arabian Identity to become a Marginalized Identity, and for the Arabs to become a weakened minority and for their language to fall and decay from it’s pedestal of greatness.

They want the Arabian language to be divided into localized accents instead of the vast Arabian language. They will achieve their goals through the means of destroying the Arabian identity in every Arab country and to replace it with petty identities or by bloating minorities.

They tried to project these new identities onto Arab countries: they have made the Iraqis Akkadians, Chaldeans and Assyrians, They've made the Syrians Syriac, the Palestinians and Jordanians Amorites and Canaanites, and the Lebanese Phoenicians, The Egyptians have became Copt.

The Maghrebis are now Tamazight, The Yemenis Sabaeans, the Sudanese Nubians. Kuwait has became Semi-Arab, The UAE has became the country of immigrants. However, the rest of the Gulf Nations have all been considered semi-states with no worth.

They try to propagate these identiries and project them onto the Arab peoples with disgust, they blow the horns of hatred against the Saudis so, the Saudis appear as the only bastion of Arabism that remains.

They also imply that the Saudis have aggressively assaulted these Arab countries historically and replaced their identities and culture with Arabian culture.

They at the same time vilify Saudi Arabia. While they might appear as proud and nationalistic Saudis they internally hope for the vilification of Saudi Arabia in the eyes of 400 Million Arabians. Knowing that these new identities don't have a logical nor historical basis.

They act like they’re the general view of Saudis (or other Arabs) to annoy whoever converses with them to eventually have the other side hate KSA and they use that same hatred to convince the Saudi youth to join them on their mission.

This is also one of the main missions of the Zionist enemy as it
has been mentioned in Israel’s "Yinon Plan", they believe that in order to defeat the Arab people; they must divide them by identity, language, religion and region.

What are the dangers of modern Shu’biyyah?

The Arab nation faces many dangers from the constant rate of Modern Arab localism, we can summarize them as follows:

In the Political Sense:
The Arab nation falls in the center of the world, on land that's striven for by the majority of the world. They're surrounded by expansionist powers whether it be France, Turkey, Israel or Iran.

The states in those countries follow a foreign politics model that pushes them to expand their influence and that mainly falls on Arabian people naturally as they're the nearest of their neighbors.

What these countries have always not been unable to do is fully attack or expand into an Arab country as the Arab people have
mostly tried to maintain considerably good relations with one another that protect from neighboring regional powers, as was the case in the Iran-Iraq war.

Where a considerable amount of Arab countries rushed to aid iraq in it's crusade against Iran.

As well as in the crisis that was happening between Syria and Turkey with PKK leader Abdullah Ocalan where Turkey threatened to attack Syria only for the Arabs to threaten to fight alongside Syria.

And in general if one of these regional powers were to invade an Arab country in a direct sense; it will not ignore the amount of Arab countries, as multitude brings reputation. Even if the Arab countries were to be in their weakest state politically, militarily and economically.

And if the Modern Arab localists were to succeed in their dwarfing of the Arab identity and decreased the amount of loyalty relative to the Arab identity; it would be a favor to these powers.

If Iran were to invade Iraq; the remainder of the Arabs will feel as if this is any other global conflict, there will be no willingness to defend their brothers politically or militarily. And this is very normal considering the context of having no belonging to the Arab nation.

In the Security Sense:
Modern Arab Localist have adopted hate speech as the dominant means to implement their agenda, And it stimulates the Saudi youth especially to practice hatred and abuse against the other Arab peoples while giving them the justifications for doing so.

They vilifies the rest of the Arab peoples from the perspective of the
Arab individual so they feel no remorse or guilt while practicing racism against them. They also delude them as if their nation has been targeted by the other Arabs.

It deludes him into thinking his ancestors were naive enough to
have trust in the other Arab peoples, So, the deluded Arab youth
has come to practice racism and hatred against on the other
Arab peoples with no remorse.

They have used the term "منطبحين” for everybody who has refused to participate in this with them in this marathon to add some sort of assertive power to whoever participates and to perceive everybody who doesn't participate as turbulent.

And in Forensic science there's a law that must applied here which is: "complete violence is mostly preceded by hate speech" and by time it's very predictable that violent cases will begin arising in-between the Arab youth.

In fact it has already began as seen between Moroccans and Algerians or Syrians and the Lebanese; These cases where violence happens on the basis of petty nationalism and artificial identities must be disassociated from completely.

In the Social Sense:
All the Arab peoples will be negatively effected societally because of the Modern Arab Localists, for example in Egypt there's a population of Arab immigrants whether they have sought refuge due to war or have come to take advantage of work opportunities, etc

They’ve settled in most Egyptian cities and especially the larger cities and they also compose a considerable percentage rage of the population, And this localist racism that targets their ancestry is very dangerous aa it's very abusive and might create an identity crisis.

that would instigate social bombs with an explosion so severe that you must never underestimate it's results. It might also result into violent acts in the community. This will also affect Non-Arab minorities which reside in Arab countries.

Having a localist and racist atmosphere will electrify general life and will lead to it being on the verge of complete chaos and anarchy.

In the Cultural Sense:
The language is considered the shield of Culture so, and the Arabic language is the shield of Arabic culture from the Gulf to the Ocean, whether it be the inherited Arabic culture or the modern globalist culture that's translated into Arabic.

as most global information has been translated into Arabic, in every possible scientific major you will find hundreds if not thousands of books and scientific sources translated into the Arabic language with every means to reaching them necessary.

The vulnerability in science in the Arab world is unnoticed as if there's a lack of translated medical books in for example Libya then Jordan or Tunisia will cover will cover it for your, and if there's a lack of translated geometrical books in Algeria then Egypt will cover it.

Modern Arab Localism will destroy this shield, as convincing every Arab country that it has a different identity will lead into them adopting different languages. And reliance on a special language in Arab countries will lead to the civilizations lack of Science and Culture.

If every Arab country were to rely on itself regarding science then it will cost unimaginable research and will drain the economy and eventually the collapse of the state because of it's lack of culture.

Whereas when all Arab countries mutually share knowledge and science from each other having saved vast amounts of wealth being spent.

They also try to use their claim that historical are limited to Saudi Arabia as a means to control other Arab countries, which is heavily contradictory from their own perspective.

How can you historically control someone when you have pushed them to change their language as a means to disassociate from you?
How can you control someone who you have disassociated
from yourself completely?

In the Economic Sense:
It’s very obvious that adopting Arab localism will affect the econ-
omy negatively. Imagine that you deteriorated all your relat-ions with your neighboring states, do you seriously believe you can export or import from them?

All your economic ties will be cut; affecting you both negatively, gas and oil pipelines will be cut completely, violating sea borders will lead into violent intervention, you'll turn yourself into an isolated state which has no participation in global trade.

If the Arab Localists succeed in doing what they want; all this will be destroyed. Everything you do will be radically changed, your life will become worse. Look at what happens when an Arab country gets isolated like what happened to Libya and Syria in 2011? Do you want that?

We're nothing without other Arab countries, we can't survive
without them. The Arab localists may first appear as those who
uncover you the truth but in reality they seek the destruction of the Arab world and it's disunity, we must unite further to fight these traitors.

Why have some Arabs subscribed to this ideology? And what are their justifications?

Through my conversations with the Arab localists or Isolationists; I
have compiled a number of their justifications in what follows:

The First Justification:
"Along the past century, we've been aiding the Arabs and we've not
seen from them but denial, hatred and insults".
It is true there's who insults and hates us on official stands and this is very heartbreaking and saddening.

but, we must be rational and not emotional and question it. How many of these people are? What drivesthem to do this? Are their issues sectarian, political or intellectual? Do we associate them as part of the people they are from or the regional anti-Arab power that houses them?

To be even more logical we know that there those of us that do the exact same thing whether to us or to other Arab countries, is this a justification for us to generalize all of our people and call them traitors to their own country?

Of course this is irrational. This can also be applied to all Arab people if applied to us, we mustn't generalize all of them for the sins of one, and we know that in every Arab country there's those who love and cherish us there're who hates us and who're neutral on us.