@MansurMaliki I appreciate your tweets on refuting modernists deformation of Islam who does it to make it acceptable for Western Kuffar & their puppets in muslim world. But with regard to your prolonged interactions with stubborn non-Muslims, I thought I will share my view 1/7 https://twitter.com/MansurMaliki/status/1416947724499529728

If someone requests you to pour a juice into a bottomless container, what would you do? Will you be asking him about the types of drink available in your home & talking about the different tastes? Or will you first kindly tell him to bring a sound container with a bottom? 2/7

Similarly, I think one must FIRST focus on the fundamentals rather than going into the branches when discussing religion. For a muslim who has sound faith, fiqh questions are important. 3/7

But for a Christian apologist who is not humble enough to first question his blind following an ugly unsound stupid creed, there is no meaning in discussing fiqh ruling (e.g. on zimmis, jihad…etc). 4/7

What is the point of discussing fiqh questions to someone who does not believed in the oneness of Allah? If they disagree to accept the basic creed of Islam (Oneness of Allah and the prophecy of Muhammad, peace be upon him), there is no point in going any further with them. 5/7

We should deal similarly with other kuffar (e.g. hindus, atheists). If they do not want to listen objectively to the fundamentals of religion, no point in discussing the furu’.
No hard feeling against you, but just my thoughts
6/7

my view is that much help is now needed by naïve muslims in muslim & non-muslims countries since the modernist onslaught is trying to teach Islam incorrectly. As for non-muslims, there is enough evidence in Quran (textual & rational) for someone sincerely looking for truth.7/7