Let's pump the breaks here for a minute. I've said this many times before, but as someone who focused on urban warfare before entering the tech/AI space, I have some reservations about what high tech can and cannot do in urban environments. Some thoughts: https://twitter.com/willknight/status/1391783674069258241
1. Urban environments are both congested in communications signals and at times inaccessible/unreliable. So you have to think about how you're going to keep these systems communicating w/ operators AND each other WHILE accounting for enemy interference, electronic warfare, etc.
2. Before anything else, you gotta ask-what problem is the tech solving? So here its abt identifying & targeting enemy combatants under the assumption algorithms will improve to a point where they can do that reliably. That's a huge problem & a really hopeful assumption, imo.
How are you going to train an AI to reliably identify combatants & differentiate them from civilians when combatants hide and move among the civilian population, use civilian infrastructure, and you rarely can evacuate the entire civilian population from the city?
But I am skeptical you'll be able to responsibly delegate target selection & engagement to AI in urban settings b/c of civilians present, the extremely dynamic conditions, how fast things can change, and the massive vulnerabilities of ML systems in such complex environments.
You can follow @RitaKonaev.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: