Read on Twitter
If every MLS original eventually rebrands to being <CityName+/-United+/-SCorFC>
is there anything special or unique at all about MLS,
or is it just a shitty, off-brand copycat of European soccer?
is there anything special or unique at all about MLS,
or is it just a shitty, off-brand copycat of European soccer?
So far we've lost:
- Dallas Burn
- Miami Fusion
- Kansas City Wiz
- Montreal Impact
- NY/NJ MetroStars
possibly - Columbus Crew
/2
- Dallas Burn
- Miami Fusion
- Kansas City Wiz
- Montreal Impact
- NY/NJ MetroStars
possibly - Columbus Crew
/2
Teams added recently:
- Minnesota United
- Atlanta United
- Orlando City
- Inter Miami
- Nashville SC
- Austin SC
- FC Cincinnatti
- St. Louis SC
- NYCFC
- Charlotte FC
/3
- Minnesota United
- Atlanta United
- Orlando City
- Inter Miami
- Nashville SC
- Austin SC
- FC Cincinnatti
- St. Louis SC
- NYCFC
- Charlotte FC
/3
I mean, it's an insult to the roots of the league.
It's an insult to being creative and different.
/4
It's an insult to being creative and different.
/4
What I love most about MLS is the ability to be a little rough around the edges and 'of the fans'.
The slicker and more homogenous and corporate it gets, the more refined by marketing teams and branding consultants
the less inclined I am to be invested.
/E
The slicker and more homogenous and corporate it gets, the more refined by marketing teams and branding consultants
the less inclined I am to be invested.
/E
