Read on Twitter
Do you need a cliff notes to understand stuff or are you being intentionally difficult?
OP: JK started the trend of long hair in male K-Pop idols.
My response: "It already happened in K-Pop and among Koreans in general10 years ago."
Your suggestion: "No, Japan did. Also America." https://twitter.com/Metal_Vdr/status/1391196997571469313
OP: JK started the trend of long hair in male K-Pop idols.
My response: "It already happened in K-Pop and among Koreans in general10 years ago."
Your suggestion: "No, Japan did. Also America." https://twitter.com/Metal_Vdr/status/1391196997571469313
What the fuck are you talking about "it started nothing"? Where in my response was there anything about starting?
The claim was that JK started something for an industry. The counter-argument was nah dude, it already existed in the industry.
*READ*
https://twitter.com/Metal_Vdr/status/1391207836986847233
The claim was that JK started something for an industry. The counter-argument was nah dude, it already existed in the industry.
*READ*
https://twitter.com/Metal_Vdr/status/1391207836986847233
Maybe you're not getting @Metal_Vdr but Koreans are pretty aware of where where cut came from. I can tell you this from being a Korean who was Korean at the time.
And no, the immediate influence for SM wasn't Visual Kei or Jrock. I didn't want to go deeper to not embarrass you
And no, the immediate influence for SM wasn't Visual Kei or Jrock. I didn't want to go deeper to not embarrass you
because it was only after it hit J-Pop idols in general that KYM and LSM showed interest - that was their package.
The only person you can claim that for was the failed second career of Moon Heejun when SM was 100% against it while he insisted that he was "A ROCK~~~ER"
The only person you can claim that for was the failed second career of Moon Heejun when SM was 100% against it while he insisted that he was "A ROCK~~~ER"
YEAH! "Let's deflect and reword the original question so that I'm not correct, instead of continuing to talk about the original point!" said the stan. "That way, I can pretend that I started and won an argument!"
https://twitter.com/Metal_Vdr/status/1391210041005559808
https://twitter.com/Metal_Vdr/status/1391210041005559808
If in doubt, deflect and change the question. "It doesn't matter if the other person said nothing about starting or creating anything. Just accuse them of having said it, to put them on the defence/backfoot so that I can stop getting called out "
https://twitter.com/Metal_Vdr/status/1391210544250687499
https://twitter.com/Metal_Vdr/status/1391210544250687499
Sorry for assuming someone who is only on social media for one celebrity, and also a little bit for his colleagues, is a stan.
Clearly, there must be another word for this self-identification.
Clearly, there must be another word for this self-identification.
The person who deflected and brought up the tangent is you, even though you're off the mark.
I engaged you in your topic of choice and now you say "suck a dick" for being shown to be ALSO misinformed there.
At least you're consistent in your behaviour.
https://twitter.com/Metal_Vdr/status/1391212473282351106
I engaged you in your topic of choice and now you say "suck a dick" for being shown to be ALSO misinformed there.
At least you're consistent in your behaviour.
https://twitter.com/Metal_Vdr/status/1391212473282351106
Aaaaand reduced to this.
Good talk. If you ever want to be exposed for being incorrect on multiple levels to the point where you can't respond again, hit me up with another one of your classic interjections. I'll try to make time in my schedule for you.
Good talk. If you ever want to be exposed for being incorrect on multiple levels to the point where you can't respond again, hit me up with another one of your classic interjections. I'll try to make time in my schedule for you.
Epilogue: lol
