Does ownership matter in VC?
Well many folks that have an ownership-agnostic model >at scale< have a different but equally key goal:
To put 10% of their fund into their top winners, regardless of ownership per se
Then, if the winner does 10x, the winner returns the fund
Well many folks that have an ownership-agnostic model >at scale< have a different but equally key goal:
To put 10% of their fund into their top winners, regardless of ownership per se
Then, if the winner does 10x, the winner returns the fund
It’s a rough model ... like trying to own 15%-20% for classic larger Series A / Series B fund
But it does underpin a lot of successes from larger funds that hunt decacorns
Put 10% of fund total in at $10m, then $100m, then $1B ...
If it’s a decacorn, you return the fund
But it does underpin a lot of successes from larger funds that hunt decacorns
Put 10% of fund total in at $10m, then $100m, then $1B ...
If it’s a decacorn, you return the fund
These funds tend to act differently
They are often fairly chill in first round they invest, but then aggressively try to pre-empt later rounds & make sure full allocations are protected
Vs folks that buy larger stake upfront tend to be a more chill later (just a touch)
They are often fairly chill in first round they invest, but then aggressively try to pre-empt later rounds & make sure full allocations are protected
Vs folks that buy larger stake upfront tend to be a more chill later (just a touch)
The rise of decacorns has made the “ownership agnostic but try to put 10% of your fund into your winners” model work for far more investors
Any $2B+ outcome where you have pro-rata rights makes it work
A decacorn makes you a genius
Any $2B+ outcome where you have pro-rata rights makes it work
A decacorn makes you a genius