On my last count there was over 60 variants of blocks and nub configurations nit to mention the variation within the nub shapes themselves would be something if individual moulds were used but that's NOT conducive or we would find them everywhere
Minerolgy suggest that these were not geopolymers and the fact there are content stones with nubs proves none lifting and where would the nub of been formed within the mould there not wooden there the same as the stone where are the moulds for the second time
The x3 configuration from sa to peru is proof the same method was used and by a similar if nit the same engieering capable set of workers or passed on knowledge does nit price that moulds were passed around or in the case of the menkurae there would of been thousands
You can follow @ancient_view.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: