Thread by @drochir_thonnuk, @dawntj90 I took your challengeyou asked if we prove that any of [...]

@dawntj90 I took your challenge
you asked if we prove that any of your memes are out of context or that the authors meant something else then you'll delete your account.

The author of the text of this meme of yours proved it

#climatebrawl #climatecrisis
https://twitter.com/damagedonegr/status/1309478444321906689?s=20

https://twitter.com/damagedonegr/status/1309478444321906689?s=20

@dawntj90 This is also taken out of context

#climatebrawl #climatecrisis

https://pubs.giss.nasa.gov/abs/ha02800o.html

this is also taken out of context having the wrong citations even...

#climatebrawl #climatecrisis

https://www.nature.com/articles/nclimate2938
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/aaf372
https://www.climatecentral.org/news/scientists-say-warming-slowdown-was-real-20068

stating that some scientist said something in a meeting of the national academy of sciences (NAS) is different to the NAS endorsing it...

#climatebrawl #climatecrisis

https://www.nytimes.com/1974/12/29/archives/forecast-for-forecasting-cloudy-in-the-long-term-climate-is-cooling.html

quote-mining from old IPCC reports too...

#climatebrawl #climatecrisis #IPCC_CH

https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar3/wg1/ (page 771)
https://www.carbonbrief.org/analysis-how-well-have-climate-models-projected-global-warming

@dawntj90 misrepresents the text as being endorsed by NASA and doesn't state that it was the from a climate model from 1971, which predicted lower temperature increase than actually measured over the last 50 years!
#climatebrawl
https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/2019GL085378 https://science.sciencemag.org/content/173/3992/138

@dawntj90 took out of context these sentences from the Hansen 1981 paper to argue that CO2 has no effect on Earth's climate. ignoring that it introduced a model predicting Earth's T due to CO2 and performed perfectly!
#climatebrawl
https://pubs.giss.nasa.gov/abs/ha04600x.html
https://www.carbonbrief.org/analysis-how-well-have-climate-models-projected-global-warming

@dawntj90 cherry picked these phrases to hide what they were referring to....

#climatebrawl #climatecrisis

http://www.pik-potsdam.de/~stefan/Publications/Other/rahmstorf_abrupt_change_2004.pdf

@dawntj90 cherry picked a statement about paleoclimate and used it to argue it applies today... That is completely misrepresenting the paper...

#climatebrawl #climatecrisis

https://pubs.giss.nasa.gov/abs/ha02800o.html

@dawntj90 cherry picked yet another sentence from the Hansen et al. 1981 paper...

#climatebrawl #climatecrisis

https://pubs.giss.nasa.gov/abs/ha04600x.html

@dawntj90 cherry picked another statement from an old IPCC report to argue we can't know the anthropogenic effect, even though the same text contradicts her as well as the more recent reports!
https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar3/wg1/ pg97
https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg1/ pg869
#climatebrawl #climatecrisis

@dawntj90 cherry picked this from a 2005 paper to argue models ignore small scale effects, ignoring that's the paper's aim and the advances since that paper.

https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsta.2005.1676
https://advances.sciencemag.org/content/7/15/eabf1674
https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/clim/24/15/2011jcli4013.1.xml
https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/2017GL076826
https://clima.caltech.edu/2020/12/04/resolving-small-scale-uncertainties-in-climate-models/

@dawntj90 cherry picked this statement about a specific group of climate models to imply the credibility of all models is in question. Couldn't be more wrong.

#climatebrawl #climatecrisis

https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/07/after-40-years-researchers-finally-see-earths-climate-destiny-more-clearly
https://twitter.com/ClimateOfGavin/status/1387824370261897218?s=20
https://www.carbonbrief.org/analysis-how-well-have-climate-models-projected-global-warming

@dawntj90 insists on the lie, by misinterpreting the text again. Despite it has already been demonstrated that the author meant something else (in his own words) thus fulfilling the challenge made by dawn...
¯\\_(ツ)_/¯

$@dawntj90 insists on the lie, by misinterpreting the text again. Despite it has already been demonstrated that the author meant something else (in his own words) thus fulfilling the challenge made by dawn...¯\\_(ツ)_/¯$

@dawntj90 cherry-picked this text to argue temperatures have stopped increasing, while the author states:
"Does this slow-down in the warming mean that the idea of anthropogenic global warming is no longer valid? The short answer is ‘no’"
#climatebrawl
http://www.remss.com/blog/recent-slowing-rise-global-temperatures/

Latest Threads Unrolled: