Read on Twitter
U see here is the problem. Up & coming right wingers using dishonest statements to paint a dehumanizing picture of the Minority.
Using stock supplies from their bigotry bag to pull out the same tired taunts of "72 hoors" for "staunch musalmans" that "need liberalisation".
Yawn. https://twitter.com/moitranikhil/status/1388140154741686273
Using stock supplies from their bigotry bag to pull out the same tired taunts of "72 hoors" for "staunch musalmans" that "need liberalisation".
Yawn. https://twitter.com/moitranikhil/status/1388140154741686273
. @MoitraNikhil has neither been able to prove that Sardana "criticized Islam" as opposed to "dehumanize Muslims" nor has he been able to prove that @ZeeshanRazvi4 celebrated his death.
And he used the above false argument to sit in judgment of the entire minority community.
And he used the above false argument to sit in judgment of the entire minority community.
He then trails off into incoherent blabber. I mean, what is the point being made here? Or are there multiple points? How are these random conclusions arrived at? You know you're down the rabbit hole when you have to use double emojis in the middle of an argument. https://twitter.com/moitranikhil/status/1388162803995877382
Straight from the Charlatan's playbook.
Use the word 'manifest' everyday to add 10 jaggi points to your wisdom. https://twitter.com/moitranikhil/status/1388213272617230342
Use the word 'manifest' everyday to add 10 jaggi points to your wisdom. https://twitter.com/moitranikhil/status/1388213272617230342
Criticizing an ideology is fair game. An almost academic exercise. An acceptable form of discourse.
Hate speech and incitement to violence towards a community is a punishable offence.
No prizes for guessing what this man's "journalistic work" fell under.
Hate speech and incitement to violence towards a community is a punishable offence.
No prizes for guessing what this man's "journalistic work" fell under.
