For years, the Supreme Court sent a consistent message about kids who commit the most serious crimes: They’re still kids. They can’t be executed. They can’t get life without parole unless they kill someone—& even then, “all but the rarest of children” deserve a chance at release.
Then, Evan Miller, the man whose case made it possible for more than 1000 juvenile lifers to one day go home, found out that he himself will never go home. He went to prison at 14 and this week a judge told him he will die there. https://twitter.com/schwartzapfel/status/1387148431173509121
Advocates fear lower court judges like the Miller’s will now feel emboldened to ignore the Miller decision’s core holding—that juvenile life without parole should be rare—hand down more of the sentences, knowing they satisfy the court’s mandate just by having the option not to.
The new high court case centered around the phrase “permanent incorrigibility,” which @SLandP told me “was made-up nonsense from the get-go.”
More important than the phrase (Kavanaugh dismissed it as a “magic-words requirement”) is the idea: must a judge formally determine that a teen is beyond hope—that he could never be rehabilitated—before sentencing him to life without parole? The new conservative majority said no.
You can follow @schwartzapfel.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: