1/7

I& #39;d like to present to you Rob Anderson& #39;s true response to everything.

For context, I was in denial and was trying to help with damage control (which he took zero advice, all reasonable). I just didn& #39;t want to believe it.

But then he sent me these screenshots....

2/7

The way he presented the questions, some of the wording he used, and how he ended it, all felt reminiscent of the former guy.

This is what drove me to speak out against him. Any reasonable person wouldn& #39;t have replied like this....

3/7

FYI: I& #39;ve blocked out the name of the reporter.

Rob called these VERY reasonable questions "horrible."

Sounds like...."nasty question"? https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="🤨" title="Gesicht mit hochgezogener Augenbraue" aria-label="Emoji: Gesicht mit hochgezogener Augenbraue">

There& #39;s more....

4/7

You may have seen the questions in the article, but I& #39;ll post them here:

5/7

This was his response.

A few things to note:

1) He dodged questions.....

6/7

2) He referred to the victims and those they reached out to, as a "shadowy cabal."

Sounds like.... ANTIFA is out to get you? https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="🤨" title="Gesicht mit hochgezogener Augenbraue" aria-label="Emoji: Gesicht mit hochgezogener Augenbraue">

Finally 3) He chalked it up to "digital misinformation."

Sounds like.....fake news? https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="🤨" title="Gesicht mit hochgezogener Augenbraue" aria-label="Emoji: Gesicht mit hochgezogener Augenbraue">

So....

7/7

To sum up:

1) Nasty Questions
2) Dodged answering the questions
3) "People are out to get me"
4) Fake News.

Right out of Trump& #39;s playbook.

Red Flags Everywhere.