One of many points that none of the pro covid fear lobby can explain is the flawed science around how this PCR test has been used
PCR amplifies genetic material to the point there's enough material available for an antigen test to detect it.. It amplifies the material in cycles
PCR amplifies genetic material to the point there's enough material available for an antigen test to detect it.. It amplifies the material in cycles
The more cycles you have to run to get a positive.. the less of the material there was there to begin with..
When you get a positive result at low cycles to positivity threshold.. you know there was lots of active virus there...
When you get a positive result at low cycles to positivity threshold.. you know there was lots of active virus there...
but as you go above 30 cycles the amplification process creates background noise and falsely creates positives from similar fragments and errors / contamination..
or it is amplifying tiny fragments of the virus that your immune system has destroyed but that linger in your blood for a few months after infection..
So all PCR viral tests are given to clinicians with 2 pieces of information.. cycles to positivity & a viral load calculation
So all PCR viral tests are given to clinicians with 2 pieces of information.. cycles to positivity & a viral load calculation
Labs run a cell sample volume control to tell them how many cells the sample/swab roughly collected.. the sample size and they use this along with the cycles to positivity threshold to calculate a very important number.. the viral load
Clinicians are given the viral load and cycles info and it immediately can allow them to differentiate between active serious infection (high viral load, low cycles.. i.e. infectious and ill) and recovered infection (low vl, virus not causing illness)
To exaggerate an illness they have run PCR test as qualitative only so clinicians can't differentiate between active & recovered infections Lancet have presented research that shows between 50 & 75% of all positives relate to recovered infections.. that's before false positives
Our government did a number of things it refuses to explain
1/ It blocked PHE from assessing the accuracy of the test.. even threatening to shut it down
2/ It set up private pop up labs with many staff who had never worked in labs before which were a contamination disaster
1/ It blocked PHE from assessing the accuracy of the test.. even threatening to shut it down
2/ It set up private pop up labs with many staff who had never worked in labs before which were a contamination disaster
3/ It refused to let the cycles to positivity threshold be provided by the labs to clinicians
4/ It ran the cycles up to 40 even when it knew many results over 30 cycles was a false positive
5/ This test had no cell sample volume control
4/ It ran the cycles up to 40 even when it knew many results over 30 cycles was a false positive
5/ This test had no cell sample volume control
6/ In the build up to the winter spike following vaccination.. Hancock was desperately trying to peak cases to explain the deaths as an organic peak of the pandemic.. he was testing school kids en mass without parental consent .. but he had also quietly dropped the gene targets
From the recommended 2 to 3 targets to a single target.. removing the inbuilt conformation in the already highly oversensitive test
This is the deliberate abuse of PCR technology and protocols to inflate cases and deaths
This is the deliberate abuse of PCR technology and protocols to inflate cases and deaths
But he also sought excess deaths and to that end he used
-mass hospital care home returns
-isolation if the elderly
-blanket DNRs in elderly and LD
-NHS shutdowns
-Fear porn campaign to scare people out of seeking medical help for even acute conditions
-mass hospital care home returns
-isolation if the elderly
-blanket DNRs in elderly and LD
-NHS shutdowns
-Fear porn campaign to scare people out of seeking medical help for even acute conditions
On top of the over sensitive.. qualitative only PCR test..final piece of the diagnostic fraud was blocking autopsies on covid patients.. removing challenge of 2 docs signing the death cert.. allowing diagnosis by suspicion..& ascribing every imaginable symptom as a covid symptom
I have repeated these points a number of times.. but this is where the fraud is exposed.. the naked abuse of science
This is what can bring them down
This is where the paper trail lies
Once more

The PMs office directly intervened to stop PHE assessing the test accuracy
This is what can bring them down
This is where the paper trail lies
Once more

The PMs office directly intervened to stop PHE assessing the test accuracy
The government refused to disclose cycles to positivity to clinicians for months
For these points there can be no legitimate excuse