Idea of 'food systems' is a false construct purposely deigned to stitch up meat. 'Scientific' FRAUD. Livestock MUCH more. Here sheep fur coat 1939 fed 2k people at time,+30-80 wool garments/carpet; tallow lanolin etc. Saved generations fossil fuel heat still in use. Synthetics by
contrast produce NO food, and are driving fashion industry's considerable 10% emissions. Only thing near as good as wool is hemp & again not durable (It's sacking) or quality, & does not feed. Cotton doesn't either, & indeed the Aral Sea was responsible in just 20 yrs for
eradicating of an important local food source & 24 endemic species of fish extinct. Crops that are for food, generally do not clothe (at least without use plastic added). Neither synthetic/crop clothing as durable as animal sources, thus you need constant replacement production,
and shift away from wool leather etc responsible for this constant use of fossil fuel-crude oil for synth & coal use. Most of this is made in China using slave labour, & landfill bound in a yr. With training shoes it's just 6 months so you need 40prs to match a pr leather
pair's life of 20 yrs. They should only be used for sport they are NOT durable. Emissions thus based on 100kg emissions for leather pr, v 35kg synth, =1.3 tonnes more pp over 20 yrs. Now multiply by billions of people. Then add belts, jackets etc. The move away from wool, leather
etc was driven by fast fashion companies that wanted you returning to well regularly: they didn't want to sell you a coat pr shoes that lasted decades. Farcical Orwellian doublethink to see Mckinsey & WWF
working with likes of H&M re sustainability, and all engaged in despicable
WEF ecofascism for land & resources grab based on false alarmist fear scapegoating indigenous people & farmers & putting the very global corporates & financiers who have caused the problem of sustainability in the driving seat, with elitist monsters like Jeremy Grantham engaged
in funding the WWF, & academic institutions to spiv idea we should farms trees instead of sheep (when he's invested in wood/forestry), on record as saying he thinks Africa 'overpopulated' (patently isn't), & inciting eco activism to disrupt. WWF of course, engaged too on the
corrupted 'science' on meat, and here I caught them in CLEAR FRAUD on the emissions of average food dishes for eg.
https://twitter.com/DMDent/status/1197231348253122570?s=20
It is inevitable that in the hands of Corporatism, vision for environment, food & tech will be taken out of hands of democracy & in to their
stewardship & using eugenics notions & fear to support it. Happened before: Nazis were corporatists it's economic model of fascism; & emphasis on tech & big data, & nature & food. They invented rewilding & evicting indigenous stewards, vision of plant based diets, & forest cult
Meanwhile reality of course (slav lands still have far more bears/wolves than Germany) is biodiversity prospers best very places where indigenous people steward; next best livestock farmer & pastoral people; & remember economic/cultural autonomy & ACTUALLY sustainable co produce
So you see how they want to talk 'food systems': a FALSE construct as it can't be separated from other consumerism. Even tech, with its wasteful inbuilt obsoletion model of business, is driving that massive Chinese industrial powerhouse, and with it deforestation. How so?
Because that industrialization, for mass tat clothing, furnishings etc has driven China's pasture loss at rate of 1.5 million hectares a yr, not far of size of Wales, for a wasteful business model, thus making them reliant on soya feed imports from Brazil. Was NEVER cattle/sheep.
I explore this further in this thread, where I highlight 'Our World in Data' fully engaged in promoting fake meat on false narrative, but caught out on the soya data they produced themselves. Also contains FAO & Sustainable Food Trust data showing cattle/sheep don't consume so
You can follow @DMDent.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: