I wrote yesterday about that new paper finding that a science-communication course doesn't improve students' science communication. The replies (on the post, and on Twitter) are interesting! (1/6)
In a nutshell, everyone agrees the study must be wrong. (It's pretty clear that the authors hope everyone is right about this, but they can't figure out how). (2/6)
Like the authors, I hope the study is wrong. But we do science, right? We need to consider the fact that the world isn't the way we hope it is. (3/6)
Some of the suggestions people bring up are plausible and important - and in general, those are ones the authors considered in the paper. Others are.... creative. (4/6)
I think it's revealing about the amount of mental gymnastics we're willing to do to preserve a favourite hypothesis, especially when the alternative is (to be honest) kind of dispiriting. (5/6)
You can follow @StephenBHeard.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: