Read on Twitter
do you have an ethical duty to select the best ethical system?
is it possible for the thorough adherence to an ethical system to itself lead to the selection of a different ethical system?
is the value of an ethical system raised by its ability to itself lead to the selection of a different ethical system?
is it possible for an ethical system to be better than the ethical system that it leads to because it leads to that ethical system?
could this metaethical approach to valuation of ethical systems lead to an endless recursion of ethical systems leading to one another?
is the consideration of metaethics actually detrimental to the selection of the best ethical system?
were your votes in this series of polls representative of how you would wish all ethical actors to respond?
is your ethics basically just an opposition to metaethics?
