This is what I've seen all day. "You need to read the ruling." No sir, you need to study the case. Only then will you see how many times Robson lied UNDER OATH. Like when he lied about knowing about the Estate, like when he lied about his book draft and emails.

My bet is if you ask this guy who Charli Michaels is, he'd say, "Who?" So maybe this guy needs to read the court documents that we've read for the past EIGHT years.

How about when he went to an MJ hater site (MJFacts) and emailed himself info from the site and then tried to cover it up? Lying by omission is still lying. So please, spare us your indignation as if we don't understand the cases.