Read on Twitter
Going to try to do some live-tweeting of the AFP argument.
Chief asks about strict scrutiny. AFP counsel says that& #39;s Thomas More& #39;s argument, but that policy fails under any standard of First Amendment scrutiny.
Chief asks an interesting question about the level of tailoring required under exacting scrutiny, saying it& #39;s not well-settled.
Thomas asks about groups that aren& #39;t controversial (groups that give beds to puppies). AFP counsel says you can& #39;t know which groups will become controversial.
Breyer is now asking how to distinguish campaign finance disclosure and tax reporting. (IJ& #39;s argues that campaign finance law is sui generis and shouldn& #39;t be expanded to other areas of the law.)
AFP answers in part that there& #39;s no statute here demanding schedule Bs, this is just bureaucratic whim. Similar answer for IRS
