We saw that in Probate Court Notes, the court examiner suggesting that Britney's c.ship is voluntary. We know a lot of facts showing it's not voluntary. But in the eye of the law, can it be considered voluntary. I try to discuss this issue in this thread. (1/5)

Note: In probate court notes, the court examiner makes a summary of the case and writes basic issues to be solved in the next hearing. So his opinions on voluntary c.ship not fact, a comment.
2/5

Petition for appointment of conservator made by James Spears, not Britney.
3/5

Not objecting doesn't mean accepting.
4/5

I'd like to also say a few things about this question:
If c.ship is voluntary, is there no need for capacity declaration?
NO, imo, that is also not true.
4.5/5

5/5 All of these show that Britney put under a c.ship against the law because her situation does not meet the requirements written under 1801.
And her situation is not a voluntary c.ship, not in the eye of the law. (if the California judiciary give a damn about the law)