Read on Twitter
Hi Emily, thanks for sharing this. Few things -
I’d be interested in seeing the questions you asked in relation to the “positive” and “negative sentiments”. Because looking at these three slides-
there’s some contradictions going on especially where you have a highly +
1/10 https://twitter.com/sbykjeon/status/1385700110294609924">https://twitter.com/sbykjeon/...
I’d be interested in seeing the questions you asked in relation to the “positive” and “negative sentiments”. Because looking at these three slides-
there’s some contradictions going on especially where you have a highly +
1/10 https://twitter.com/sbykjeon/status/1385700110294609924">https://twitter.com/sbykjeon/...
Positive word and pretty positive motivations, but then when you get to quality/variety there’s only a response related to quality not the variety, and the quoted merchandise release pattern reaction contradicts the positive word sentiment related to how they feel about ++
2/10
2/10
When they get a weverse notification (an indication of the merch release pattern)
Next, for these slides reflecting the sentiment as well, the negative comments are highlighted, bringing more of the focus to them, than to the positive comments. This to me reflects a bias ++
3/10
Next, for these slides reflecting the sentiment as well, the negative comments are highlighted, bringing more of the focus to them, than to the positive comments. This to me reflects a bias ++
3/10
Yes there are fewer positive comment that you have listed, but you already bring attention away from them when you highlight keywords in the negative comments. And as for the likeliness, the question displayed doesn’t match the graph and transcript so it would probably be
4/10
4/10
Better if amended to reflect how likely they are to buy something and then display another graph on how much they felt merch reflected the message (a box plot because you’re better off looking at the overall data points to see where days might be skewed and not just observe
5/10
5/10
the mean but the median and standard deviations as well which would have a more accurate depiction of how people feel in answer to the question.
6/10
6/10
As for the conclusion, it’s a stretch to be able to say we need to have more diversity and dissociation from current offerings given that your findings presented didn’t give much of an indication that they didn’t feel like there was lack of diversity... your findings as ++
7/10
7/10
Presented state that they found it too much but not “up to par” in terms of quality... so again it’s kind of contradictory and a conclusion that should be revisited. And the same thing for your second conclusion, the findings presented don’t support that.
8/10
8/10
Finally as for the sources listed
One that stands out to me is having Jeff Benjamin as a source. He’s widely known within the fandom to be unreliable especially in our space so to have him as a source for something that has the intention of being representative of said ++
9/10
One that stands out to me is having Jeff Benjamin as a source. He’s widely known within the fandom to be unreliable especially in our space so to have him as a source for something that has the intention of being representative of said ++
9/10
space makes the validity questionable.
So yeah these are my thoughts after a couple times going through this, if anyone needs clarification has questions or wants to further discuss feel free.
10/10
So yeah these are my thoughts after a couple times going through this, if anyone needs clarification has questions or wants to further discuss feel free.
10/10
