So. Peep the propaganda.

Follow this thread because your going to learn something. Fr

The title: Indus Valley genome lacks ancestry from "Iranian" farmers or Central Asian pastoralists

The study: the indus valley dna shows 87% ""iranian"" dna(see thread 4), but they weren't farmers because they were in india before farming even existed(according to them.)

So, furthermore they find the major haplogroups of these indus valley individuals were from a genome 'specific to india'

The genome that makes up 70-95% of the ancestry of most Indian populations has been the main source of ancestry in India for 12,000 years atleast.

Ancient DNA studies don't really exist in India because DNA doesn't survive in that climate so this one was rare.

The propaganda is of course the evil "aryan v.s. dravidian" bull* they teach in the indian school curriculum which is unchanged from the colonial curriculum.

"Aryans" and "Dravidians" are literally the same, I will later show you the wickedness of this propaganda in this thread

But first; people in North West india(the indus valley) have had people migrate from both the northwest and southeast. But the people are literally the same people that lived there 12 000 years ago. (see next thread)

The woman from the study probably looked something like this.

The "flow of genes" is from northwest and southeast both, people from southern india have migrated northwest and vice versa since a very ancient time

But the migrations(maybe even the genes themselves?)from outside of India are new and apparently never happened before 2500BC

Now, before I elaborate on that last post I would like to just say:

'Indian' culture and Knowledge existed from North to South in its full and infinitely diverse form since before 20, 000BC. All the sciences too.

So the assumption they go off is wrong in the 1st place

Now, in their propagandist culture the migration of genes from outside of India to the northwest happened in around 1500-2000 BC and they call this the Aryan migration, which used to be called an invasion.

They teach that Sanskrit and the Knowledge came with that.

I would rather not post 100000 proofs and evidences to show you how old this tradition/culture is, I've done that before anyways.

But I'll break down the propaganda of the thief.

This "aryan gene" (r1a) is the major source of ancestry for the europeans.

It isn't the major source of ancestry for Indians. The maximum contribution is like 30%.

Now, my stance on this is that this genome developed in India. Hence why very isolated populations in the Indian Ocean like the Vedda carry it.

There is no proof(the genetics is evidence but not proof) of a very large scale migration or invasion at that time. It may have happened but either way, the tradition and culture already existed.

But I also don't doubt this mutation originated in many populations separately.

This haplogroup(R1) became the dominant genome in Europe within 200 years. And in india it became a small part of literally every single person's(from the himalayas to the Sri lanka jungle...) genome within like 500 years.

You won't hear that from the materialists though.

The genome is generally in larger proportion in the Northwest and North of India.

Now, no Indian text ever talks about any sort of racism. But the British literally created a skin color based caste system. I'll break down the original caste system for you though.

The ORIGINAL indian caste system has 4 varnas. Varna means creed class rank etc.

The highest rank is the mystics/scientists, then the warriors/protectors/royalty, then it is the governors, law makers, accountants, etc. the lowest is the people who do simple labor.

That isn't oppression, it is true civilization. The first mention of the 4 varnas literally says they are all parts of one whole.

Yes, there was gatekeeping and rules to who can access knowledge but if you think that is oppressive then you can stop studying Indian religion.

And none of those rules had to do with your skin color or shape of your nose. Please lol.

People hate on Brahmins and Pundits but they literally preserved all of the ancient knowledge for millenia through endless invasions and were historically the poorest people.

The hate is projected onto them because historically conquerors (indian civilization isn't a conquering culture it is a KNOWLEDGE and SPIRITUAL culture)

always used trust of people in Brahmin priest(ess) as a medium for propaganda. One of those being determining someone's varna.

Also, something else I'd like to mention now that I've already wrote all this. The Sanskrit language was originally strictly for temple initiates.

The common language in India was Dravidian. Punjabi is one proof of this, I'll explain.

This hypothesis becomes a very plausible theory when you discover there is tribes who speak Dravidian languages as far north as Balochistan.

The Brahu'i people speak an ancient Dravidian language isolated from other related languages by like 1000s of miles.

I'll explain what I said about Panjabi but whats more; the oldest written texts are all Dravidian, Sanskrit remained strictly oral until just before Greek times.

The oldest Sanskrit writings known to commoners I believe are the Vedas written on palm leaves in Kerala.

You can see this because a Tamil person who knows zero hindi or whatever form of prakrit will have the same accent as a North/central indian person when they speak English.

Now, Hindi and Panjabi use the same words derived from Sanskrit but they sound very different.

Hindi is closer in many ways to the way Sanskrit sounds. Panjabi however has a completely unique sound that doesn't linguistically exist in any related language, i believe that is a remnant of the former Dravidian language spoken by us.

Why we started using Sanskrit words? Idk

But we degenerated the Sanskrit by doing it forsure. Sanskrit is the ESSENCE of a magically potent language.

Any language that comes in contact with Sanskrit steals words from it because they can't translate, but the words have too much resonance.

Latin, Greek, English etc. and even Jamaican Patois(from Indian slaves in the carribean) all use untranslated Sanskrit words.