Read on Twitter
19 REASONS NOT TO
(An attempt to escape the censor)
(An attempt to escape the censor)
1. YOU DON’T NEED THEM. SARS-CoV-2 is only a threat to those over the age of 70 or with a serious health condition. Even then it has an infection fatality rate of 0.23%, 0.05% if you’re under 70; and a large percentage of the population already had or has since acquired immunity.
2. THEY DON’T PROTECT YOU. The claims of the pharmaceutical companies manufacturing them that their products offer ‘95% protection’ from SARS-CoV-2 are misleading and false, being based on inaccurate and manipulated figures derived from inadequate and incomplete clinical trials.
3. THEY DON’T PROTECT OTHERS. There is no evidence to indicate they stop transmission of SARS-CoV-2; and the transmission of a virus by healthy people without symptoms (which has no precedence in the history of epidemics) is a myth created to spread the current crisis.
4. THEY ARE DANGEROUS. The adverse drug reaction rate to the AstraZeneca and Pfizer products are far higher than is usual for vaccines, with adverse reactions in the UK occurring in anything up to 22% of the injected, and deaths following injection now approaching 900.
5. DENIAL OF THEIR EFFECTS. Despite the growing evidence for concern over their safety, every UK medical body has flatly denied any causal connection between the experimental products they are administering and the serious adverse reactions and deaths shortly after injection.
6. LONG-TERM EFFECTS. They are all DNA-based, and such biotechnology has never been approved for use on humans before. They have only been given emergency authorisation for use on the justification that we are facing an unprecedented threat to public health that does not exist.
7. NO ONE IS LIABLE. Existing UK legislation on their development, manufacture, promotion and administration has been changed to indemnify every agent in the vaccination process against liability for any adverse reactions, and financial compensation will be borne by the public.
8. INDUSTRY CORRUPTION. They have been developed by an industry synonymous with malpractice, bribery, lobbying and lawsuits from which only its vast profits allow it to escape prosecution, and whose investors will make billions from the mandating of their products in perpetuity.
9. GOVERNMENT CORRUPTION. The financial influence of the pharmaceutical industry over the regulatory agencies they fund, and which authorise the use of their products, makes anything those agencies say about the efficacy or safety or necessity of those products untrustworthy.
10. PUBLIC MISINFORMATION. Everything the public has been told about them by the Government, its medical advisors, the Department of Health and Social Care, Public Health England and the National Health Service contains medically meaningless and unscientific lies.
11. PROPAGANDA. They are not being made available to the vulnerable on a voluntary basis, but are being aggressively marketed by an unprecedented campaign conducted at every level of society, and projected to continue in the future as part of the emerging UK biosecurity state.
12. INDOCTRINATION. They are indoctrinating the UK population, and in particular our children and youth, into a US-culture of ‘health and safety’ in which the former is promoted through drug dependency and the latter on the propagation of irrational fears.
13. WEAPONISED. They are not being administered on a medical basis but have been weaponised as part of the Government’s threat to maintain lockdown restrictions, which have killed tens of thousands denied medical care, until a sufficient percentage of the population is injected.
14. IDEOLOGICAL. Even those injected are not absolved of medically meaningless and harmful requirements such as mandatory masks and social distancing. This indicates their real function is not medical but financial and political, preparing our compliance with future regulations.
15. VACCINE PASSPORTS. As confirmation of which, when a sufficient percentage of the population has taken them, digital ‘COVID health passports’ will be made either compulsory or a condition of our UK citizenship, including our right to work, travel and access to public services.
16. DISCRIMINATION. The requirement to be injected with them repeatedly and in perpetuity will change our status as citizens under UK law, effectively removing the civil liberties and human rights of those who refuse them, and thereby reducing them to second-class citizens.
17. TOTALITARIAN. Upgraded with whatever ‘biosecurity’ requirements will be imposed in the future, the digital surveillance and monitoring of our health status, movements, location and associations will impose a totalitarian system of control over the entire UK population.
18. HYSTERIA. Anyone raising these reasons is denounced as ‘anti-vaxx’, accused of ’vaccine hesitancy’, denigrated as ‘anti-science’, dismissed as ‘covidiots’, charged with endangering others, and other ways of avoiding responding rationally and with evidence to their arguments.
19. CENSORSHIP. Informed consent is a requirement of medical treatment, without which the administer is liable to charges of assault. Yet anyone sharing information or arguments that contradict the blanket suppression of public debate is censored by the UK biosecurity state.
For these and other arguments for why every one of us should refuse and resist the normalisation and imposition of experimental treatments and digital health passports, read our collection of articles on the expansion of the UK biosecurity state. https://architectsforsocialhousing.co.uk/2021/03/04/brave-new-world-expanding-the-uk-biosecurity-state-through-the-winter-of-2020-2021/
