Undeterred by the UT gov's veto of an unconstitutional (and preempted by #Section230) bill, @JStuartAdams wants states to press ahead with similar bills that would be struck down by for the same reasons. I told @SchottHappens why that's a bad move: https://www.sltrib.com/news/politics/2021/04/22/can-government-rein/

Creating any liability for content moderation based on "bias" or "unfairness," or attempting to impose viewpoint neutrality rules is expressly preempted by Section 230, which only permits state laws consistent with it--and 230 permits platforms to moderate however they see fit,

And forcing platforms to host speech that they would rather not publish or be associated with would violate their First Amendment rights-just like a law that prohibited a newspaper from making viewpoint-based decisions on LTE publication or forcing them to publish certain content