🇬🇧 #UK: The Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill casts #protest as an inconvenience rather than a fundamental right to be protected.

In our analysis w/ @LawOfProtest, we assess the bill’s compliance w/ int' standards.
A thread 🧵 on our analysis. 👉 https://bit.ly/2RYWAT3 
2/ The #UK gov't quotes examples of protests by different #humanrights and #environmental #ClimateAction groups, and also the costs associated with their protests, to justify the new powers and penalties set out in the Bill. #KillTheBill
3/
⚡️However, international standards are clear that the right to #peacefulassembly incorporates some degree of disruption.

💷They also explicitly reject any attempt to justify the imposition of restrictions on protest on grounds of cost.
4/ The bill also raises other concerns in terms of:
🔴 the state's obligation to promote an enabling environment for peaceful assemblies;
🔴 additional thresholds for intervention;
🔴 regulation for one-person protests;
🔴 meaning of ‘serious disruption’;
🔴 Increased penalties.
5/
Overall, if adopted in current form, the Bill will likely violate int'l human rights standards by striking at the essence of the right to #freedomofassembly by:

1⃣ conferring discretion on the Home Secretary to define ‘disruption’ without Parliamentary oversight;
6/
2⃣ introducing vague concepts (e.g., ‘serious unease’) subject to discretionary interpretation by the police;
3⃣ increasing the powers of the police to decide on fundamental issues about the exercise of the right;
4⃣ disproportionately increasing the penalties for protesters.
You can follow @enablingNGOlaw.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: