Read on Twitter
A father wants to protect & take care of his little girl
A husband wants to protect & take care his young wife
A son wants to protect & take care of his old mother
These 3 are the most emotionally invested to genuinely protect the woman
Their absence leaves her vulnerable
A husband wants to protect & take care his young wife
A son wants to protect & take care of his old mother
These 3 are the most emotionally invested to genuinely protect the woman
Their absence leaves her vulnerable
Yet look at how women are being conditioned to look at them
They started with the Father - He is a tyrant
He wants to discipline, restrict
He wants to decide who a woman should marry -
Only a tyrant -a patriach would do that - There can be no other valid reason
They started with the Father - He is a tyrant
He wants to discipline, restrict
He wants to decide who a woman should marry -
Only a tyrant -a patriach would do that - There can be no other valid reason
For example-
Is his life experience dealing with men irrelevant?
Can't he be a better long term judge of a man's character and future?
Isn't he most emotionally invested to want his daughter's best interest?
No - She is conditioned to look at his concern as tyranny
Is his life experience dealing with men irrelevant?
Can't he be a better long term judge of a man's character and future?
Isn't he most emotionally invested to want his daughter's best interest?
No - She is conditioned to look at his concern as tyranny
So she chooses the husband but he isn't spared either
- He wants her to take care of her home & family
- He sees her as "baby producing machine"
- He wants her to cook
- He restricts her freedom
He of course must be an oppressor
Ergo She must be incentivized to divorce him
- He wants her to take care of her home & family
- He sees her as "baby producing machine"
- He wants her to cook
- He restricts her freedom
He of course must be an oppressor
Ergo She must be incentivized to divorce him
With father & husband out of the way - Only the son remains
However She is supposed to be a concerned global citizen - so she shouldn't be having many kids anyways
She has to be "prouder" if the kid is a daughter
If it's a son - He is a future tyrant - a future oppressor
However She is supposed to be a concerned global citizen - so she shouldn't be having many kids anyways
She has to be "prouder" if the kid is a daughter
If it's a son - He is a future tyrant - a future oppressor
All his natural masculine expression should be suppressed
In fact he shouldn't be a man at all - He should be a daughter or at least behave less masculine
Once this happens all the 3 men who have the most to gain emotionally from a woman's well-being are effectively sidelined
In fact he shouldn't be a man at all - He should be a daughter or at least behave less masculine
Once this happens all the 3 men who have the most to gain emotionally from a woman's well-being are effectively sidelined
She has been potentially isolated at one or all stages of her life
Ready to be used as a tool by the government & elites who are the least emotionally invested in her well-being
Too stupid to see without love there can be no real protection or concern for her well-being
Ready to be used as a tool by the government & elites who are the least emotionally invested in her well-being
Too stupid to see without love there can be no real protection or concern for her well-being
