"Member Fanbases" that aren& #39;t actually here to support and uplift our creators, we see you & your moves. We hope ARMY& #39;s long memory holds onto this moment.

So much for loving, uplifting, & protecting: you& #39;re endorsing someone trying to make bank off a connection to our creators.

To recap:
A garment is worn in a historic moment. Our creators& #39; company wished to purchase it. The designer refused. Designer then emphasized its status as "unwashed" (repeatedly) & put it up for auction.

Solos are defending the auctioning of it (the listing since removed).

https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="👉" title="Rückhand Zeigefinger nach rechts" aria-label="Emoji: Rückhand Zeigefinger nach rechts">The garment was sought by the company for purchase. They were rejected.
https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="👉" title="Rückhand Zeigefinger nach rechts" aria-label="Emoji: Rückhand Zeigefinger nach rechts">The designer put it into an auction, to the highest bidder.

He saw a cash cow, exploiting the connection with our creators... & solos are defending him.

So much for "Protecting" our creators.

Rather than suggesting ARMY "educate themselves" about the nature of such auctions, we would encourage "member fanbases" to consider morality & decency over their desperation to prop up their fantasies of clout based on our creators& #39; activities (direct or affiliated).

"Does this sound creepy if I say it out loud in public?" if the answer is yes, you should probably think twice about trying to use it as a defense.

A thread with chronological updates on the situation: https://twitter.com/MrsTOH2O/status/1384329118930673665?s=20">https://twitter.com/MrsTOH2O/...

If you are on the side of supporting someone who turned the company he& #39;s signed with & then turns around & lists it at an auction to make the highest profit:

You are supporting clout chasing, money chasing greed. You are not supporting a member.

Shame on you.