Read on Twitter
You know, you always hear about people talking about the "horrible lessons" you learn from Disney movies, and one example they always cite is how Belle from Beauty and the Beast was a case of Stockholm Syndrome. And frankly, that's utter bullshit.
For one thing, Stockholm Syndrome itself is a very dubious thing to begin with; there's not a lot of evidence to definitively validate that Stockholm Syndrome is even a real thing. So the premise is flawed from the start.
But even if you accept that Stockholm Syndrome (i.e. something "snapping" in a captive's mind due to the abuse at the hands of a captor causing the captive to fall in love with their abuser) is real, that's still an inaccurate description of what happens in the movie.
Belle is forced into the circumstances, but she doesn't submit to the Beast's abuse; she refuses to have dinner with him, she runs away from him (even breaking her promise by running away from the castle at one point). Never in the film does she give him a pass for abuse.
That "something there that wasn't there before" is not something we see until the Beast learns to control his temper and STOP abusing her. She demands respect from him, and she stands her ground until she gets it. That's exactly the RIGHT lesson for a film to teach.
And when the Beast loses his temper and becomes violent towards her, she runs away and removes herself from the dangerous situation. Even after he saves her from the wolves, she doesn't just let him off the hook: "If you hadn't frightened me, I wouldn't have run away."
