Read on Twitter
By no longer radtrad I mean:
1. Vatican II& #39;s proper interpretation is in continuity with Tradition and the Church says so.
2. The Novus Ordo Missae is a validly promulgated liturgy and as such is protected by the Infallibility of the Church. Though in many/most cases it is full…
1. Vatican II& #39;s proper interpretation is in continuity with Tradition and the Church says so.
2. The Novus Ordo Missae is a validly promulgated liturgy and as such is protected by the Infallibility of the Church. Though in many/most cases it is full…
…of liturgical abuses, whichshould be avoided, the NO itself as promulgated by the Church is a Catholic rite which cannot be contemned (Trent sess. 7 can. 13).
3. I no longer support the SSPX. Though the Church says we can go to Mass there, the Church also says authoritatively
3. I no longer support the SSPX. Though the Church says we can go to Mass there, the Church also says authoritatively
that the Econe consecrations were a schismatic act that resulted in the excommunication of Abp Lefebvre and the other bishops. It also authoritatively says that canon 1323 does not apply. It& #39;s not what I wanted to be true, but there& #39;s no way around it. Roma locuta, causa finita. https://twitter.com/AdLucem7/status/1384329990704144384">https://twitter.com/AdLucem7/...
As for how the Hermeneutic of Continuity came to even seem possible to me, I have to thank Dr Thomas Pink for his explanation of how Dignitatis Humanae is in continuity with past Catholic teaching, including condemnations of religious liberty.
