By no longer radtrad I mean:
1. Vatican II's proper interpretation is in continuity with Tradition and the Church says so.
2. The Novus Ordo Missae is a validly promulgated liturgy and as such is protected by the Infallibility of the Church. Though in many/most cases it is full…

…of liturgical abuses, whichshould be avoided, the NO itself as promulgated by the Church is a Catholic rite which cannot be contemned (Trent sess. 7 can. 13).
3. I no longer support the SSPX. Though the Church says we can go to Mass there, the Church also says authoritatively

that the Econe consecrations were a schismatic act that resulted in the excommunication of Abp Lefebvre and the other bishops. It also authoritatively says that canon 1323 does not apply. It's not what I wanted to be true, but there's no way around it. Roma locuta, causa finita. https://twitter.com/AdLucem7/status/1384329990704144384

As for how the Hermeneutic of Continuity came to even seem possible to me, I have to thank Dr Thomas Pink for his explanation of how Dignitatis Humanae is in continuity with past Catholic teaching, including condemnations of religious liberty.