Read on Twitter
2/ In a new briefing by our Director @RuthFox01, Prof Meg Russell, Director @ConUnit_UCL, @JoePTomlinson @publiclawprojct & Ronan Cormocain @BinghamCentre highlight 5 ways the govt& #39;s approach has marginalised MPs & calls for parliamentary accountability urgently to be restored
3/ We highlight the erosion of parliamentary control in relation to (1) emergency legislation, (2) regulations, & (3) money; (4) MPs denied equal participation rights in some @HouseofCommons business; and (5) wholesale and unnecessary use of proxy votes. https://www.hansardsociety.org.uk/publications/briefings/the-marginalisation-of-the-house-of-commons-under-covid-has-been-shocking-a">https://www.hansardsociety.org.uk/publicati...
4/ Individually, each of these five developments is damaging. Collectively, they amount to a fundamental undermining and exclusion of the @HouseofCommons and its members from crucial decisions– on policy, spending, and the management of the House of Commons itself.
5/ In a parliamentary democracy, govt accountability to Parliament is a core constitutional principle. But in a national emergency, the gravity of the situation can require immediate parliamentary scrutiny be temporarily sacrificed in exchange for subsequent accountability.
6/ Yet the government has failed to keep its side of the bargain. Too frequently, announcements have been made at press conferences, or briefed privately to the media, rather than presented for democratic scrutiny and questioning by MPs.
7/ Ministers have sought extraordinary powers while consistently excluding both the @HouseofCommons as a whole, and certain MPs, from participating in proper oversight.
8/ In the early days of the pandemic necessity arguably justified this approach. But a year on, a real risk exists of damaging precedents being set. This is magnified by the fact that some recent developments have accelerated negative scrutiny trends predating the pandemic.
9/ Unless MPs collectively take a stand against Parliament’s continued marginalisation by ministers, what was once extraordinary risks becoming the norm. There are real dangers that the govt has become too comfortable with decision-making that evades parliamentary scrutiny.
10/ The excessive use of emergency procedures must end, key announcements should be made first to the @HouseofCommons and MPs must be able to debate and approve major policy changes well before they come into effect.
11/ Robust scrutiny is essential for transparency and democratic accountability, but also to ensure that policy itself is adequately robust. Further measures – crucially including any move to vaccine passports – need full oversight by MPs.
12/ Some difficulties during the pandemic have amplified problems at Westminster that had been visible for years. Improvements in the scrutiny of delegated legislation and financial matters have long been called for, particularly by the @HansardSociety.
13/ The extent to which the govt controls the House of Commons agenda, and thereby its procedures, also needs to be reduced. In exiting the current emergency situation, MPs’ decision-making powers in all of these areas badly need to be enhanced. (THE END!) https://www.hansardsociety.org.uk/publications/briefings/the-marginalisation-of-the-house-of-commons-under-covid-has-been-shocking-a">https://www.hansardsociety.org.uk/publicati...
